CI: Handle the "p: CI Fix" label#37950
Merged
vbraun merged 1 commit intosagemath:developfrom May 12, 2024
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Should we also check that the status is "positive review" ? |
Contributor
Author
|
No, that's not really practical. For example in making #37926, I really wanted to test it on the broken workflow runs for the latest beta. |
Contributor
|
I understand and mostly agree, but this is what has been voted. |
Contributor
Author
|
No, what has been voted on is that 'Only PRs with positive review should be marked with the "CI Fix" label.' |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks! |
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2024
sagemathgh-37950: CI: Handle the "p: CI Fix" label <!-- ^ Please provide a concise and informative title. --> <!-- ^ Don't put issue numbers in the title, do this in the PR description below. --> <!-- ^ For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#12345" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1 + 2". --> <!-- v Describe your changes below in detail. --> <!-- v Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- v If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example, "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> As decided by vote in https://groups.google.com/g/sage- devel/c/OKwwUGyKveo/m/vpyCXYBqAAAJ (2024-03). The only change here is to change the search from open PRs with "p: blocker / 1" labels to those with "p: CI Fix" labels. No attempt is made to take any status labels into account. All open PRs with the "p: CI Fix" label are processed. ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [x] The title is concise and informative. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example, --> <!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency --> <!-- - sagemath#34567: ... --> URL: sagemath#37950 Reported by: Matthias Köppe Reviewer(s): Frédéric Chapoton
vbraun
pushed a commit
to vbraun/sage
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2024
sagemathgh-37950: CI: Handle the "p: CI Fix" label <!-- ^ Please provide a concise and informative title. --> <!-- ^ Don't put issue numbers in the title, do this in the PR description below. --> <!-- ^ For example, instead of "Fixes sagemath#12345" use "Introduce new method to calculate 1 + 2". --> <!-- v Describe your changes below in detail. --> <!-- v Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> <!-- v If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For example, "Fixes sagemath#12345". --> As decided by vote in https://groups.google.com/g/sage- devel/c/OKwwUGyKveo/m/vpyCXYBqAAAJ (2024-03). The only change here is to change the search from open PRs with "p: blocker / 1" labels to those with "p: CI Fix" labels. No attempt is made to take any status labels into account. All open PRs with the "p: CI Fix" label are processed. ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [x] The title is concise and informative. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview. ### ⌛ Dependencies <!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on. For example, --> <!-- - sagemath#12345: short description why this is a dependency --> <!-- - sagemath#34567: ... --> URL: sagemath#37950 Reported by: Matthias Köppe Reviewer(s): Frédéric Chapoton
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As decided by vote in https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/OKwwUGyKveo/m/vpyCXYBqAAAJ (2024-03).
The only change here is to change the search from open PRs with "p: blocker / 1" labels to those with "p: CI Fix" labels.
No attempt is made to take any status labels into account. All open PRs with the "p: CI Fix" label are processed.
📝 Checklist
⌛ Dependencies