Do not constraint TAITs when checking impl/trait item compatibility#99356
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Jul 18, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Collaborator
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2022
…pertraits, r=oli-obk Do not constraint TAITs when checking impl/trait item compatibility Check out the UI test for the example. Open to other approaches to fix this issue -- ideally we _would_ be able to collect this opaque type constraint in a way to use it in `find_opaque_ty_constraints`, so we can report a better mismatch error in the incompatible case, and just allow it in the compatible case. But that seems like a bigger refactor, so I wouldn't want to start it unless someone else thought it was a good idea. cc rust-lang#99348 r? `@oli-obk`
This was referenced Jul 17, 2022
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2022
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98383 (Remove restrictions on compare-exchange memory ordering.) - rust-lang#99350 (Be more precise when suggesting removal of parens on unit ctor) - rust-lang#99356 (Do not constraint TAITs when checking impl/trait item compatibility) - rust-lang#99360 (Do not ICE when we have `-Zunpretty=expanded` with invalid ABI) - rust-lang#99373 (Fix source code sidebar tree auto-expand) - rust-lang#99374 (Fix doc for `rchunks_exact`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Check out the UI test for the example.
Open to other approaches to fix this issue -- ideally we would be able to collect this opaque type constraint in a way to use it in
find_opaque_ty_constraints, so we can report a better mismatch error in the incompatible case, and just allow it in the compatible case. But that seems like a bigger refactor, so I wouldn't want to start it unless someone else thought it was a good idea.cc #99348
r? @oli-obk