Signed-off-by: Tom Kaitchuck <Tom.Kaitchuck@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Mara Bos <m-ou.se@m-ou.se>

…r=pnkfelix

Add regression test for issue rust-lang#76042

Originally posted in rust-lang#76042 (comment).
r? `@pnkfelix`

Doc change: Remove mention of `fnv` in HashMap

Disclaimer: I am the author of [aHash](https://github.com/tkaitchuck/aHash).

This changes the Rustdoc in `HashMap` from mentioning the `fnv` crate to mentioning the `aHash` crate, as an alternative `Hasher` implementation.

### Why

Fnv [has poor hash quality](https://github.com/rurban/smhasher), is [slow for larger keys](https://github.com/tkaitchuck/aHash/blob/master/compare/readme.md#speed), and does not provide dos resistance, because it is unkeyed (this can also cause [other problems](https://accidentallyquadratic.tumblr.com/post/153545455987/rust-hash-iteration-reinsertion)).

Fnv has acceptable performance for integers and has very poor performance with keys >32 bytes. This is the reason it was removed from the standard library in rust-lang#37229 .

Because regardless of which dimension you value, there are better alternatives, it does not make sense for anyone to consider using `fnv`.

The text mentioning `fnv` in the standard library continues to create confusion: rust-lang/hashbrown#153  rust-lang/hashbrown#9 . There are also a number of [crates using it](https://crates.io/crates/fnv/reverse_dependencies) a great many of which are hashing strings (Which is when Fnv is the [worst](https://github.com/cbreeden/fxhash#benchmarks), [possible](https://github.com/tkaitchuck/aHash#speed), [choice](http://cglab.ca/~abeinges/blah/hash-rs/).)

I think aHash makes the most sense to mention as an alternative because it is the most credible option (in my obviously biased opinion). It offers [good performance on numbers and strings](https://github.com/tkaitchuck/aHash/blob/master/compare/readme.md#speed), is [of high quality](https://github.com/tkaitchuck/aHash#hash-quality), and [provides dos resistance](https://github.com/tkaitchuck/aHash/wiki/How-aHash-is-resists-DOS-attacks). It is popular (see [stats](https://crates.io/crates/ahash)) and is the default hasher for [hashbrown](https://crates.io/crates/hashbrown) and [dashmap](https://crates.io/crates/dashmap) which are the most popular alternative hashmaps. Finally it does not have any of the [`gotcha` cases](https://github.com/tkaitchuck/aHash#fxhash) that `FxHash` suffers from. (Which is the other popular hashing option when DOS attacks are not a concern)

Signed-off-by: Tom Kaitchuck <tom.kaitchuck@emc.com>

…sakis

Add type to `ConstKind::Placeholder`

I simply threaded `<'tcx>` through everything that required it. I'm not sure whether this is the correct thing to do, but it seems to work.

r? `@nikomatsakis`

…, r=jyn514

Rustdoc check option

The ultimate goal behind this option would be to have `rustdoc --check` being run when you use `cargo check` as a second step.

r? `@jyn514`

add dropck test for const params

r? `@nikomatsakis` or `@varkor`

add explicit test for const param promotion

r? `@RalfJung`