Conversation
|
r? @pnkfelix (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
I'm not 100% sure of the comment change in |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #39071) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
Rebased. |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #39243) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
@nikomatsakis you said that you've started a crater run on this PR. Are there any results in yet? Also, will me rebasing this PR in any way inconvenience the crater run? I don't want to force-push and destroy something :) |
|
@est31 let me check :) also, rebase away |
|
@est31 something went wrong with my run :( |
* Remove the Reflect trait * Remove the "reflect" lang feature
|
@nikomatsakis rebased. |
|
I will crater it. |
|
the three root regressions reported by crater all are pretty obvious (each crate is importing |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit af46d69 has been approved by |
|
The feature is deprecated and removal is the plan, and the PR looks good; impact is minimal. So I gave r+! |
Remove Reflect PR for removing the `Reflect` trait. Opened so that a crater run can be done for testing the impact: #27749 (comment) Fixes #27749
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
PR for removing the
Reflecttrait. Opened so that a crater run can be done for testing the impact: #27749 (comment)Fixes #27749