std: Ignore close_read_wakes_up on Windows#38867
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Jan 12, 2017
Merged
Conversation
It looks like in practice at least this test will not pass on Windows. Empirically it is prone to blocking forever, presumably because a call to `shutdown` doesn't actually wake up other threads on Windows. We don't document this as a guarantee for `shutdown`, nor do we internally rely on it. This test originated in a time long since passed when it was leveraged for canceling I/O, but nowadays there's nothing fancy happening in the standard library so it's not really a productive test anyway, hence just ignoring it on Windows. Closes rust-lang#31657
Contributor
|
r? @brson (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Contributor
|
Cancelling I/O can be even more complex than this as Windows, Linux and MacOS have different behaviours regarding the interruption of blocking calls (and what about the BSDs? and so on).
Note that on *nix |
Contributor
|
@bors r+ p=1 |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 7eb43f1 has been approved by |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2017
std: Ignore close_read_wakes_up on Windows It looks like in practice at least this test will not pass on Windows. Empirically it is prone to blocking forever, presumably because a call to `shutdown` doesn't actually wake up other threads on Windows. We don't document this as a guarantee for `shutdown`, nor do we internally rely on it. This test originated in a time long since passed when it was leveraged for canceling I/O, but nowadays there's nothing fancy happening in the standard library so it's not really a productive test anyway, hence just ignoring it on Windows. Closes #31657
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2022
…, r=Mark-Simulacrum Enable `close_read_wakes_up` test on Windows I wonder if we could/should try enabling this again? It was closed by rust-lang#38867 due to rust-lang#31657. I've tried running this test (along with other tests) on my machine a number of times and haven't seen this fail yet, Caveat: the worst that can happen is this succeeds initially but then causes random hangs in CI. This is not a great failure mode and would be a reason not to do this. If this does work out, closes rust-lang#39006 r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It looks like in practice at least this test will not pass on Windows.
Empirically it is prone to blocking forever, presumably because a call to
shutdowndoesn't actually wake up other threads on Windows.We don't document this as a guarantee for
shutdown, nor do we internally relyon it. This test originated in a time long since passed when it was leveraged
for canceling I/O, but nowadays there's nothing fancy happening in the standard
library so it's not really a productive test anyway, hence just ignoring it on
Windows.
Closes #31657