Conversation
Manishearth
commented
Apr 24, 2015
- Successful merges: Add backquotes to have better looking rust code #24523, remove debug and display chapter #24698, Explain how to create a Stdin or Stdout #24699, Fix a tiny typo in core::raw docs #24700, Remove stale comment #24706, rustdoc: add back [-]/[+] toggle links for unstable methods #24717, Fix quote tests #24718, Stop mentioning obsolete integer suffixes #24721, Audit reference manual: 5. Crates and source files #24727
- Failed merges:
this is too small for its own thing, I think.
`ToCStr` was removed with `old_io` and the current method `as_os_str` is inherent to `Path`, meaning there is no suitable trait bound that could be used here.
`us` and `is` were replaced with `usize` and `isize` some time ago.
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
@bors: r+ force p=10 |
|
📌 Commit f772079 has been approved by |
|
@bors: force |
|
⌛ Testing commit f772079 with merge 2efcd0b... |
|
💔 Test failed - auto-mac-32-opt |
|
@bors: r+ p=10 |
|
📌 Commit 874e093 has been approved by |
|
⌛ Testing commit 874e093 with merge f90f9e8... |
|
💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-nopt-t |
|
@bors: r+ p=10 |
|
📌 Commit 874e093 has been approved by |
|
@bors: force |
1 similar comment
|
@bors: force |
|
@bors: r+ p=10 |
|
📌 Commit 874e093 has been approved by |
|
@bors: retry ah |
|
⌛ Testing commit 874e093 with merge 71c92fa... |
|
💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-nopt-t |
|
@bors: r+ force |
|
📌 Commit ae3c27c has been approved by |
|
⌛ Testing commit ae3c27c with merge 1f52dee... |
|
💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-opt |
|
@bors: r+ force |
|
📌 Commit 1447ee4 has been approved by |
…r=steveklabnik this is too small for its own thing, I think.
…ichton `ToCStr` was removed with `old_io` and the current method `as_os_str` is inherent to `Path`, meaning there is no suitable trait bound that could be used here. r? @alexcrichton
…crichton r? @alexcrichton (since you added `.stability` warning messages)
`us` and `is` were replaced with `usize` and `isize` some time ago. Other than that, 3.5.2.1.5 is correct.
…bnik It was in pretty good shape, but since that is my pet peeve, I clarified the compiler/interpreter distinction and why it is irrelevant for this section. Otherwise only a couple of minor clarifications, and weasel words where reality is more complicated than the text accounted for (e.g., there is more than one kind of library). r? @steveklabnik