Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Jan 15, 2026

Follow-up of #150934.

It removes the Option<> wrapping for SharedContext::target field and completely removed the target_id field. Considering this type contains a closure and never updates its target_id field, there is no need to keep it around, it can be used directly in the lint emitter.

r? @JonathanBrouwer

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 15, 2026

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing

cc @jdonszelmann, @JonathanBrouwer

@rustbot rustbot added A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 15, 2026
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

I don't expect any perf change but just in case:

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 15, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Jan 15, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: fb50715 (fb507154de75738e8d91f27a9e5fad530a7354dc, parent: a6acf0f07f0ed1c12e26dc0db3b9bf1d0504a0bb)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (fb50715): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.4% [-0.5%, -0.2%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 473.873s -> 473.523s (-0.07%)
Artifact size: 383.59 MiB -> 383.57 MiB (-0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants