Skip to content

Conversation

@dianqk
Copy link
Member

@dianqk dianqk commented Jan 14, 2026

I haven't addressed how to remove the pass, but it can be simplified.

r? ghost

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 14, 2026
@dianqk
Copy link
Member Author

dianqk commented Jan 14, 2026

@bors try parent=f57eac1bf98cb5d578e3364b64365ec398c137df @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2026
[Experiment] Uses SsaLocals and MiRPatch to simplify SimplifyComparisonIntegral
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jan 14, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Jan 14, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 113015b (113015b78f962411be16853e0a544b42aadcb378, parent: f57eac1bf98cb5d578e3364b64365ec398c137df)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (113015b): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.4% [0.2%, 1.3%] 6
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.3% [-1.8%, -0.8%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.0% [-1.8%, 1.3%] 8

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.5%, secondary -0.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.1% [2.4%, 4.2%] 3
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.1% [-5.1%, -1.9%] 4
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.3% [-2.6%, -0.8%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.5% [-5.1%, 4.2%] 7

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

Results (primary -0.0%, secondary 0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.0% [0.0%, 0.2%] 9
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.1% [0.0%, 0.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.1% [-1.1%, -0.0%] 13
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.0% [-0.1%, -0.0%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.0% [-1.1%, 0.2%] 22

Bootstrap: 473.812s -> 474.036s (0.05%)
Artifact size: 391.34 MiB -> 391.32 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Jan 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

perf-regression Performance regression. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants