rustc book: fix grammar

It was added in ddee45e ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97802/changes#diff-85dc642a7bdad363a9e37d2491230280fcd977391ba7a242bda2da9ddb55f654) to be specific) when SIGPIPE was controlled with an attribute on `fn main()` which meant it could also be combined with `#[rustc_main]`:

    #[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]
    #[rustc_main]
    fn rustc_main() {

The test stopped being needed in cde0cde when `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` was replaced by `-Zon-broken-pipe=...`. And it will not be needed when `-Zon-broken-pipe=...` is replaced by an Externally Implementable Item (see rust-lang#150591). Let's remove this test.

Tracking issue:
- rust-lang#150588

tests/ui/runtime/on-broken-pipe/with-rustc_main.rs: Not needed so remove

It was added in ddee45e ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97802/changes#diff-85dc642a7bdad363a9e37d2491230280fcd977391ba7a242bda2da9ddb55f654) to be specific) when SIGPIPE was controlled with an attribute on `fn main()` which meant it could also be combined with `#[rustc_main]`:

    #[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]
    #[rustc_main]
    fn rustc_main() {

The test stopped being needed in cde0cde when `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` was replaced by `-Zon-broken-pipe=...`. And it will not be needed when `-Zon-broken-pipe=...` is replaced by an Externally Implementable Item (see rust-lang#150591). Let's remove this test.

Tracking issue:
- rust-lang#150588

tests/ui/runtime/on-broken-pipe/with-rustc_main.rs: Not needed so remove

It was added in ddee45e ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97802/changes#diff-85dc642a7bdad363a9e37d2491230280fcd977391ba7a242bda2da9ddb55f654) to be specific) when SIGPIPE was controlled with an attribute on `fn main()` which meant it could also be combined with `#[rustc_main]`:

    #[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]
    #[rustc_main]
    fn rustc_main() {

The test stopped being needed in cde0cde when `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` was replaced by `-Zon-broken-pipe=...`. And it will not be needed when `-Zon-broken-pipe=...` is replaced by an Externally Implementable Item (see rust-lang#150591). Let's remove this test.

Tracking issue:
- rust-lang#150588

tests/ui/runtime/on-broken-pipe/with-rustc_main.rs: Not needed so remove

It was added in ddee45e ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97802/changes#diff-85dc642a7bdad363a9e37d2491230280fcd977391ba7a242bda2da9ddb55f654) to be specific) when SIGPIPE was controlled with an attribute on `fn main()` which meant it could also be combined with `#[rustc_main]`:

    #[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]
    #[rustc_main]
    fn rustc_main() {

The test stopped being needed in cde0cde when `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` was replaced by `-Zon-broken-pipe=...`. And it will not be needed when `-Zon-broken-pipe=...` is replaced by an Externally Implementable Item (see rust-lang#150591). Let's remove this test.

Tracking issue:
- rust-lang#150588

Fix `alloc_error_handler` signature mismatch

It was added in ddee45e ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97802/changes#diff-85dc642a7bdad363a9e37d2491230280fcd977391ba7a242bda2da9ddb55f654) to be specific) when SIGPIPE was controlled with an attribute on `fn main()` which meant it could also be combined with `#[rustc_main]`:

    #[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]
    #[rustc_main]
    fn rustc_main() {

The test stopped being needed in cde0cde when `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` was replaced by `-Zon-broken-pipe=...`. And it will not be needed when `-Zon-broken-pipe=...` is replaced by an Externally Implementable Item (see rust-lang#150591). Let's remove this test.

Tracking issue:
- rust-lang#150588

Rollup merge of #150757 - rm-unneded-test, r=bjorn3

Fix `alloc_error_handler` signature mismatch

It was added in ddee45e ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97802/changes#diff-85dc642a7bdad363a9e37d2491230280fcd977391ba7a242bda2da9ddb55f654) to be specific) when SIGPIPE was controlled with an attribute on `fn main()` which meant it could also be combined with `#[rustc_main]`:

    #[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]
    #[rustc_main]
    fn rustc_main() {

The test stopped being needed in cde0cde when `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` was replaced by `-Zon-broken-pipe=...`. And it will not be needed when `-Zon-broken-pipe=...` is replaced by an Externally Implementable Item (see #150591). Let's remove this test.

Tracking issue:
- #150588

compiler: Forward attributes to eii-expanded macros

Since rust-lang#150592 is quite complicated to reason about I figured it would be good to split it up in smaller pieces that are easier to digest. Here is the attribute fix in isolation.

## The Problem

With this eii in **library/std/src/io/mod.rs**:
```rs
/// Foo
#[eii(on_broken_pipe)]
#[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
pub fn on_broken_pipe() -> OnBrokenPipe {
    OnBrokenPipe::BackwardsCompatible
}
```

you currently get this compilation error:

```
error: attribute macro has missing stability attribute
    --> library/std/src/io/mod.rs:2269:1
     |
2269 | #[eii(on_broken_pipe)]
     | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^--
     | |
     | in this attribute macro expansion
     |
    ::: library/core/src/macros/mod.rs:1899:5
     |
1899 |     pub macro eii($item:item) {
     |     ------------- in this expansion of `#[eii]`
```

because with ` MAGIC_EXTRA_RUSTFLAGS=-Zunpretty=expanded ./x build library/std` we can see that a pub item in the expanded code is indeed missing that attribute:

```rs
const _: () =
    {
        #[on_broken_pipe]
        fn on_broken_pipe() -> OnBrokenPipe {
            OnBrokenPipe::BackwardsCompatible
        }
    };
unsafe extern "Rust" {
    /// Foo
    #[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
    #[rustc_eii_extern_item]
    pub safe fn on_broken_pipe()
    -> OnBrokenPipe;
}
#[rustc_builtin_macro(eii_shared_macro)]
#[eii_extern_target(on_broken_pipe)]
pub macro on_broken_pipe { () => {} }
```

## The Solution

With the fix, that error goes away because we get this expanded code instead:

```rs
const _: () =
    {
        #[on_broken_pipe]
        fn on_broken_pipe() -> OnBrokenPipe {
            OnBrokenPipe::BackwardsCompatible
        }
    };
unsafe extern "Rust" {
    /// Foo
    #[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
    #[rustc_eii_extern_item]
    pub safe fn on_broken_pipe()
    -> OnBrokenPipe;
}
/// Foo
#[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
#[rustc_builtin_macro(eii_shared_macro)]
#[eii_extern_target(on_broken_pipe)]
pub macro on_broken_pipe { () => {} }
```

Note that we also need to forward the docs, otherwise get get (fatal) warnings like these:

```
warning: missing documentation for an attribute macro
    --> library/std/src/io/mod.rs:2269:1
```

r? @jdonszelmann

Tracking issues:
- rust-lang#125418
- rust-lang#150588

### What about a test?

rust-lang#150591 will prevent regressions once it lands since it does not build without this fix. I think it is overkill to add a temporary eii to std before that.

compiler: Forward attributes to eii-expanded macros

Since rust-lang#150592 is quite complicated to reason about I figured it would be good to split it up in smaller pieces that are easier to digest. Here is the attribute fix in isolation.

## The Problem

With this eii in **library/std/src/io/mod.rs**:
```rs
/// Foo
#[eii(on_broken_pipe)]
#[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
pub fn on_broken_pipe() -> OnBrokenPipe {
    OnBrokenPipe::BackwardsCompatible
}
```

you currently get this compilation error:

```
error: attribute macro has missing stability attribute
    --> library/std/src/io/mod.rs:2269:1
     |
2269 | #[eii(on_broken_pipe)]
     | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^--
     | |
     | in this attribute macro expansion
     |
    ::: library/core/src/macros/mod.rs:1899:5
     |
1899 |     pub macro eii($item:item) {
     |     ------------- in this expansion of `#[eii]`
```

because with ` MAGIC_EXTRA_RUSTFLAGS=-Zunpretty=expanded ./x build library/std` we can see that a pub item in the expanded code is indeed missing that attribute:

```rs
const _: () =
    {
        #[on_broken_pipe]
        fn on_broken_pipe() -> OnBrokenPipe {
            OnBrokenPipe::BackwardsCompatible
        }
    };
unsafe extern "Rust" {
    /// Foo
    #[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
    #[rustc_eii_extern_item]
    pub safe fn on_broken_pipe()
    -> OnBrokenPipe;
}
#[rustc_builtin_macro(eii_shared_macro)]
#[eii_extern_target(on_broken_pipe)]
pub macro on_broken_pipe { () => {} }
```

## The Solution

With the fix, that error goes away because we get this expanded code instead:

```rs
const _: () =
    {
        #[on_broken_pipe]
        fn on_broken_pipe() -> OnBrokenPipe {
            OnBrokenPipe::BackwardsCompatible
        }
    };
unsafe extern "Rust" {
    /// Foo
    #[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
    #[rustc_eii_extern_item]
    pub safe fn on_broken_pipe()
    -> OnBrokenPipe;
}
/// Foo
#[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
#[rustc_builtin_macro(eii_shared_macro)]
#[eii_extern_target(on_broken_pipe)]
pub macro on_broken_pipe { () => {} }
```

Note that we also need to forward the docs, otherwise get get (fatal) warnings like these:

```
warning: missing documentation for an attribute macro
    --> library/std/src/io/mod.rs:2269:1
```

r? @jdonszelmann

Tracking issues:
- rust-lang#125418
- rust-lang#150588

### What about a test?

rust-lang#150591 will prevent regressions once it lands since it does not build without this fix. I think it is overkill to add a temporary eii to std before that.

Rollup merge of #150913 - eii-macro-attrs, r=jdonszelmann

compiler: Forward attributes to eii-expanded macros

Since #150592 is quite complicated to reason about I figured it would be good to split it up in smaller pieces that are easier to digest. Here is the attribute fix in isolation.

## The Problem

With this eii in **library/std/src/io/mod.rs**:
```rs
/// Foo
#[eii(on_broken_pipe)]
#[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
pub fn on_broken_pipe() -> OnBrokenPipe {
    OnBrokenPipe::BackwardsCompatible
}
```

you currently get this compilation error:

```
error: attribute macro has missing stability attribute
    --> library/std/src/io/mod.rs:2269:1
     |
2269 | #[eii(on_broken_pipe)]
     | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^--
     | |
     | in this attribute macro expansion
     |
    ::: library/core/src/macros/mod.rs:1899:5
     |
1899 |     pub macro eii($item:item) {
     |     ------------- in this expansion of `#[eii]`
```

because with ` MAGIC_EXTRA_RUSTFLAGS=-Zunpretty=expanded ./x build library/std` we can see that a pub item in the expanded code is indeed missing that attribute:

```rs
const _: () =
    {
        #[on_broken_pipe]
        fn on_broken_pipe() -> OnBrokenPipe {
            OnBrokenPipe::BackwardsCompatible
        }
    };
unsafe extern "Rust" {
    /// Foo
    #[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
    #[rustc_eii_extern_item]
    pub safe fn on_broken_pipe()
    -> OnBrokenPipe;
}
#[rustc_builtin_macro(eii_shared_macro)]
#[eii_extern_target(on_broken_pipe)]
pub macro on_broken_pipe { () => {} }
```

## The Solution

With the fix, that error goes away because we get this expanded code instead:

```rs
const _: () =
    {
        #[on_broken_pipe]
        fn on_broken_pipe() -> OnBrokenPipe {
            OnBrokenPipe::BackwardsCompatible
        }
    };
unsafe extern "Rust" {
    /// Foo
    #[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
    #[rustc_eii_extern_item]
    pub safe fn on_broken_pipe()
    -> OnBrokenPipe;
}
/// Foo
#[unstable(feature = "on_broken_pipe", issue = "150588")]
#[rustc_builtin_macro(eii_shared_macro)]
#[eii_extern_target(on_broken_pipe)]
pub macro on_broken_pipe { () => {} }
```

Note that we also need to forward the docs, otherwise get get (fatal) warnings like these:

```
warning: missing documentation for an attribute macro
    --> library/std/src/io/mod.rs:2269:1
```

r? @jdonszelmann

Tracking issues:
- #125418
- #150588

### What about a test?

#150591 will prevent regressions once it lands since it does not build without this fix. I think it is overkill to add a temporary eii to std before that.