emacs: highlight macro_name! in macro invocations using [] delimiters#14087
Closed
huonw wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Closed
emacs: highlight macro_name! in macro invocations using [] delimiters#14087huonw wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
macro_name! in macro invocations using [] delimiters#14087huonw wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
r? @pnkfelix |
Contributor
|
part of #8793 |
Contributor
|
this should close #13979 |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for the heads-up @tomjakubowski |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2023
Support computing layout of RPIT And some refactoring to make code more type safe.
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2025
Checks for `Read::bytes()` on an unbuffered Read type. The default implementation calls `read` for each byte, which can be very inefficient for data that’s not in memory, such as `File`. Considerations which I'd like to have feedback on: * Currently this lint triggers when `.bytes()` is called on any type that implements `std::io::Read` but not `std::io::BufRead`. This is quite aggressive and in and may result in false positives. Alternatives: * Only trigger on concrete types, not generic types. This does mean that cases where a function is generic over a `R: Read` and calls `.bytes()` are not caught by the lint, which could be quite a nasty case of this bug. * Only trigger on an allowlist of stdlib types * Compromise: Is it possible to make this lint `pedantic` on types that are not on a allowlist? * Theoretically, a trait implementation of `Read` could override `.bytes()` with an efficient implementation. I'm not sure how to add this check to the lint, and I can't find any cases of this being done in practice. * I don't think an automatic fix for this lint is possible, but I'd love to be proven wrong * This is my first time contributing to clippy, please let me know if I did anything wrong Fixes rust-lang#14087 ``` changelog: [`unbuffered_bytes`]: new lint ```
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.