Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestions to MaybeIncorrect#121338
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Feb 21, 2024
Merged
Conversation
… a .fixed file exists
Collaborator
|
r? @Nadrieril rustbot has assigned @Nadrieril. Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer |
Urgau
reviewed
Feb 20, 2024
tests/ui/lint/ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons_suggestions.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
49025fa to
0e58333
Compare
Nadrieril
reviewed
Feb 20, 2024
Member
|
Looks good! One nit, r=me after that. @bors rollup=always |
…rrect It is possible to have more than one valid suggestion, which when applied together via rustfix causes the code to no longer compile. This is a temporary workaround; the real long term solution to these issues is to solve <rust-lang#53934>.
0e58333 to
4d386d9
Compare
Member
|
Thank you for fixing this! @bors r+ |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121208 (Convert `delayed_bug`s to `bug`s.) - rust-lang#121288 (make rustc_expand translatable) - rust-lang#121304 (Add docs for extension proc-macro) - rust-lang#121328 (Make --verbose imply -Z write-long-types-to-disk=no) - rust-lang#121338 (Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestions to MaybeIncorrect) - rust-lang#121361 (diagnostic items for legacy numeric modules) - rust-lang#121375 (Print proper relative path for descriptive name check) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121338 - jieyouxu:ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons_suggestion, r=Nadrieril Downgrade ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons suggestions to MaybeIncorrect In certain cases like rust-lang#121330, it is possible to have more than one suggestion from the `ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisons` lint (which before this PR are `MachineApplicable`). When this gets passed to rustfix, rustfix makes *multiple* changes according to the suggestions which result in incorrect code. This is a temporary workaround. The real long term solution to problems like these is to address <rust-lang#53934>. This PR also includes a drive-by edit to the panic message emitted by compiletest because "ui" test suite now uses `//`@`` directives. Fixes rust-lang#121330.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In certain cases like #121330, it is possible to have more than one suggestion from the
ambiguous_wide_pointer_comparisonslint (which before this PR areMachineApplicable). When this gets passed to rustfix, rustfix makes multiple changes according to the suggestions which result in incorrect code.This is a temporary workaround. The real long term solution to problems like these is to address #53934.
This PR also includes a drive-by edit to the panic message emitted by compiletest because "ui" test suite now uses
//@directives.Fixes #121330.