Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @cuviper (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

• @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
• @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

Hi, thank you for the PR! This is not a type, what it means is that out of all the methods in the standard library, collect belongs to those that are more powerful than many other methods which are less powerful. I don't think "most" is more appropriate, but I do agree that the wording is not great. What do you think about just deleting this sentence?
The previous sentence is also not great, the word "iterable" is often used to refer to implementors of IntoIterator (which is called Iterable in Java, for example), but collect takes an iterator. Maybe that sentence could be deleted too, but I don't think it's entirely useless either. What do you think?

This is not a type

cough cough

@Riahiamirreza

Ping from triage: I'm closing this due to inactivity, Please reopen when you are ready to continue with this.
Note: if you are going to continue please open the PR BEFORE you push to it, else you won't be able to reopen - this is a quirk of github.
Thanks for your contribution.

@rustbot label: +S-inactive

Hi, thank you for the PR! This is not a type, what it means is that out of all the methods in the standard library, collect belongs to those that are more powerful than many other methods which are less powerful. I don't think "most" is more appropriate, but I do agree that the wording is not great. What do you think about just deleting this sentence? The previous sentence is also not great, the word "iterable" is often used to refer to implementors of IntoIterator (which is called Iterable in Java, for example), but collect takes an iterator. Maybe that sentence could be deleted too, but I don't think it's entirely useless either. What do you think?

How about deleting the second sentence and changing the first sentence to collect() can take any iterator and turn it into the relevant collection.?