Make assumption functions in new solver take Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>>#112665
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Jun 17, 2023
Merged
Make assumption functions in new solver take Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>>#112665bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>>#112665bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred to the core trait solver cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor |
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup=always |
Collaborator
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2023
…lause, r=lcnr Make assumption functions in new solver take `Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>>` We just use an if-let to match on an optional clause at all the places where we transition from `Predicate` -> `Clause`, but I assume that when things like item-bounds and param-env start to only store `Clause`s then those can just be trivially dropped. r? `@lcnr`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2023
…mpiler-errors Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#111074 (Relax implicit `T: Sized` bounds on `BufReader<T>`, `BufWriter<T>` and `LineWriter<T>`) - rust-lang#112226 (std: available_parallelism using native netbsd api first) - rust-lang#112474 (Support 128-bit enum variant in debuginfo codegen) - rust-lang#112662 (`#[lang_item]` for `core::ptr::Unique`) - rust-lang#112665 (Make assumption functions in new solver take `Binder<'tcx, Clause<'tcx>>`) - rust-lang#112684 (Disable alignment checks on i686-pc-windows-msvc) - rust-lang#112706 (Add `SyntaxContext::is_root`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We just use an if-let to match on an optional clause at all the places where we transition from
Predicate->Clause, but I assume that when things like item-bounds and param-env start to only storeClauses then those can just be trivially dropped.r? @lcnr