Update links to Rust Reference in diagnostic#112498
Conversation
Instead of linking to the old Rust Reference site on static.rust-lang.org, link to the current website doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference instead in diagnostic about incorrect literals.
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @TaKO8Ki (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
|
bors :( |
I grepped for |
|
@Nilstrieb Oops -- I just realized that this link more closely corresponds to the intention of the original link, and also has more complete and relevant information. I just pushed another commit. Apologies if I'm doing anything wrong, this is my first time contributing to Rust. |
|
That's fine, I'll reapprove the new commit. |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#112475 (Fix issue for module name when surround the struct literal with parentheses) - rust-lang#112477 (Give more helpful progress messages in `Assemble`) - rust-lang#112484 (Fix ntdll linkage issues on Windows UWP platforms) - rust-lang#112492 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format) - rust-lang#112493 (iat selection: normalize self ty & completely erase bound vars) - rust-lang#112497 (abs_sub: fix typo 0[-:][+.]0) - rust-lang#112498 (Update links to Rust Reference in diagnostic) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Instead of linking to the old Rust Reference site, which is severely outdated (Rust 1.17), link to the current website in diagnostic about incorrect literals.