(docs) Change "wanting" to "want"#111582
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
|
Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
|
I agree. |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#102673 (Update doc for `PhantomData` to match code example) - rust-lang#111531 (Fix ice caused by shorthand fields in NoFieldsForFnCall) - rust-lang#111547 (Start node has no immediate dominator) - rust-lang#111548 (add util function to TokenStream to eliminate some clones) - rust-lang#111560 (Simplify find_width_of_character_at_span.) - rust-lang#111569 (Appease lints) - rust-lang#111581 (Fix some misleading and copy-pasted `Pattern` examples) - rust-lang#111582 ((docs) Change "wanting" to "want") Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Changing " If you’re wanting" to "If you want".
Wanting is not wrong, of course, but I think that "If you want" feels more natural to most readers.