Correct typo (back_box -> black_box)#109620
Correct typo (back_box -> black_box)#109620bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom evie-calico:patch-1
back_box -> black_box)#109620Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @joshtriplett (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
|
Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Correct typo (`back_box` -> `black_box`)
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#109007 (rustdoc: skip `// some variants omitted` if enum is `#[non_exhaustive]`) - rust-lang#109593 (Rustdoc Book refer to rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples. Fixes rust-lang#109592.) - rust-lang#109595 (Improve "Auto-hide trait implementation documentation" GUI test) - rust-lang#109619 (Still-further-specializable projections are ambiguous in new solver) - rust-lang#109620 (Correct typo (`back_box` -> `black_box`)) - rust-lang#109621 (Refactor: `VariantIdx::from_u32(0)` -> `FIRST_VARIANT`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
No description provided.