std: time: Avoid to use "was created" in elapsed() description#108370
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Feb 24, 2023
Merged
std: time: Avoid to use "was created" in elapsed() description#108370bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
".. since this instant was created" is inaccurate and misleading,
consider the following case:
let i1 = Instant::now(); // i1 is created at T1
let i2 = i1 + Duration::from_nanos(0); // i2 is "created" at T2
i2.elapsed(); // at T3
Per the current description, `elapsed()` at T3 should return T3 - T2?
Therefore removes the "was created" in the description of
{Instant,SystemTime}::elapsed(). And since these types represent times,
it's OK to use prepostions with them, e.g. "since this instant".
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @thomcc (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
Collaborator
|
Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
Member
|
Hm, good point. Thanks. @bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2023
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#106541 (implement const iterator using `rustc_do_not_const_check`) - rust-lang#106918 (Rebuild BinaryHeap on unwind from retain) - rust-lang#106923 (Restore behavior when primary bundle is missing) - rust-lang#108169 (Make query keys `Copy`) - rust-lang#108287 (Add test for bad cast with deferred projection equality) - rust-lang#108370 (std: time: Avoid to use "was created" in elapsed() description) - rust-lang#108377 (Fix ICE in 'duplicate diagnostic item' diagnostic) - rust-lang#108388 (parser: provide better suggestions and errors on closures with braces missing) - rust-lang#108391 (Fix `is_terminal`'s handling of long paths on Windows.) - rust-lang#108401 (diagnostics: remove inconsistent English article "this" from E0107) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
".. since this instant was created" is inaccurate and misleading, consider the following case:
Per the current description,
elapsed()at T3 should return T3 - T2?To avoid the inaccuracy, removes the "was created" in the description of {Instant,SystemTime}::elapsed().
And since these types represent times, it's OK to use prepostions with them, e.g. "since this instant".