Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
r? @thomcc (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Collaborator
|
Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc cc @antoyo |
Member
Author
|
Found a few more redundant cases. |
Member
|
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2022
…homcc Remove redundant `all` in cfg This appears to have been accidentally left in after removing the other branches rust-lang@45bf1ed (hat tip to kangalioo for the git archaeology)
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2022
…homcc Remove redundant `all` in cfg This appears to have been accidentally left in after removing the other branches rust-lang@45bf1ed (hat tip to kangalioo for the git archaeology)
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2022
…homcc Remove redundant `all` in cfg This appears to have been accidentally left in after removing the other branches rust-lang@45bf1ed (hat tip to kangalioo for the git archaeology)
This was referenced Nov 27, 2022
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#95836 (Use `rust_out{exe_suffix}` for doctests) - rust-lang#104882 (notify lcnr on changes to `ObligationCtxt`) - rust-lang#104892 (Explain how to get the discriminant out of a `#[repr(T)] enum` with payload) - rust-lang#104917 (Allow non-org members to label `requires-debug-assertions`) - rust-lang#104931 (Pretty-print generators with their `generator_kind`) - rust-lang#104934 (Remove redundant `all` in cfg) - rust-lang#104944 (Support unit tests for jsondoclint) - rust-lang#104946 (rustdoc: improve popover focus handling JS) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This appears to have been accidentally left in after removing the other branches 45bf1ed
(hat tip to kangalioo for the git archaeology)