…ce, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't intra linkcheck reference

This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).

I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.

…ce, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't intra linkcheck reference

This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).

I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.

…ce, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't intra linkcheck reference

This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).

I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.

…ce, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't intra linkcheck reference

This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).

I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.

…ce, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't intra linkcheck reference

This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).

I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.

…ce, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't intra linkcheck reference

This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).

I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.

…ce, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't intra linkcheck reference

This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).

I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.

…ce, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't intra linkcheck reference

This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).

I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.

…ce, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't intra linkcheck reference

This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).

I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103570 (Stabilize integer logarithms)
 - rust-lang#103694 (Add documentation examples for `pointer::mask`)
 - rust-lang#103919 (Unescaping cleanups)
 - rust-lang#103933 (Promote {aarch64,i686,x86_64}-unknown-uefi to Tier 2)
 - rust-lang#103952 (Don't intra linkcheck reference)
 - rust-lang#104111 (rustdoc: Add mutable to the description)
 - rust-lang#104125 (Const Compare for Tuples)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

…ce, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Don't intra linkcheck reference

This removes the reference from the intra-doc link checks. This causes problems if any of the reference content needs to change, it causes the linkchecker to break. The reference has its own broken link check (https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/tree/master/style-check) which uses pulldown-cmark on the source to find actual broken links (instead of false-positives like this regex does).

I think the intra-doc link check could potentially be removed completely, since I think rustdoc is now checking for them well enough. However, it may serve as a decent regression check.

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103570 (Stabilize integer logarithms)
 - rust-lang#103694 (Add documentation examples for `pointer::mask`)
 - rust-lang#103919 (Unescaping cleanups)
 - rust-lang#103933 (Promote {aarch64,i686,x86_64}-unknown-uefi to Tier 2)
 - rust-lang#103952 (Don't intra linkcheck reference)
 - rust-lang#104111 (rustdoc: Add mutable to the description)
 - rust-lang#104125 (Const Compare for Tuples)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup