docs(test): Document Execs assertions based on port effort #14793
Merged
bors merged 5 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Nov 8, 2024
Merged
docs(test): Document Execs assertions based on port effort #14793bors merged 5 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 5 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
A lot of this was pulled from rust-lang#14039
Collaborator
|
r? @weihanglo rustbot has assigned @weihanglo. Use |
weihanglo
approved these changes
Nov 8, 2024
| /// | ||
| /// See [`compare`] for supported patterns. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// <div class="warning"> |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cool! I didn't know rustdoc has special CSS classes until today.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think they actually have something newer but its not documented. I'll ping them about it.
weihanglo
reviewed
Nov 8, 2024
| /// your test will pass without verifying the correct behavior. If | ||
| /// possible, write the test first so that it fails, and then implement | ||
| /// your fix/feature to make it pass. | ||
| #[deprecated] |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not going to block this, but still prefer them being deprecated, as people have less change to misuse.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you have other ideas, I'm open
Member
|
@bors r+ |
Contributor
Contributor
Contributor
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2024
Update cargo 16 commits in 0310497822a7a673a330a5dd068b7aaa579a265e..4a2d8dc636445b276288543882e076f254b3ae95 2024-11-01 19:27:56 +0000 to 2024-11-09 19:10:33 +0000 - test: adjust `cargo_test_env` to unblock rust submodule update (rust-lang/cargo#14803) - feat(warnings): add build.warnings option (rust-lang/cargo#14388) - Revert "feat: Add `CARGO_RUSTC_CURRENT_DIR`" (rust-lang/cargo#14799) - CI: make the `lint-docs` job required (rust-lang/cargo#14797) - Switch CI from bors to merge queue (rust-lang/cargo#14718) - docs(test): Document Execs assertions based on port effort (rust-lang/cargo#14793) - fix(test): Make redactions consistent with snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14790) - test(gc): Update remaining unordered tests to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14785) - Normalize the `target` paths (rust-lang/cargo#14497) - rustfix: replace special-case duplicate handling with error (rust-lang/cargo#14782) - test: Update some emaining unordered tests to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14781) - Change config paths to only check CARGO_HOME for cargo-script (rust-lang/cargo#14749) - Enable transfer feature in triagebot (rust-lang/cargo#14777) - Add transactional semantics to `rustfix` (rust-lang/cargo#14747) - doc: fix `GlobalContext` reference (rust-lang/cargo#14773) - chore: update handlebars to v6, fix build error (rust-lang/cargo#14772)
mati865
pushed a commit
to mati865/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2024
Update cargo 16 commits in 0310497822a7a673a330a5dd068b7aaa579a265e..4a2d8dc636445b276288543882e076f254b3ae95 2024-11-01 19:27:56 +0000 to 2024-11-09 19:10:33 +0000 - test: adjust `cargo_test_env` to unblock rust submodule update (rust-lang/cargo#14803) - feat(warnings): add build.warnings option (rust-lang/cargo#14388) - Revert "feat: Add `CARGO_RUSTC_CURRENT_DIR`" (rust-lang/cargo#14799) - CI: make the `lint-docs` job required (rust-lang/cargo#14797) - Switch CI from bors to merge queue (rust-lang/cargo#14718) - docs(test): Document Execs assertions based on port effort (rust-lang/cargo#14793) - fix(test): Make redactions consistent with snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14790) - test(gc): Update remaining unordered tests to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14785) - Normalize the `target` paths (rust-lang/cargo#14497) - rustfix: replace special-case duplicate handling with error (rust-lang/cargo#14782) - test: Update some emaining unordered tests to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14781) - Change config paths to only check CARGO_HOME for cargo-script (rust-lang/cargo#14749) - Enable transfer feature in triagebot (rust-lang/cargo#14777) - Add transactional semantics to `rustfix` (rust-lang/cargo#14747) - doc: fix `GlobalContext` reference (rust-lang/cargo#14773) - chore: update handlebars to v6, fix build error (rust-lang/cargo#14772)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
Closes #14039
A lot of this was pulled from #14039, common assertions people need to write, and from seeing people not noticing features that exist.
I'm leaving behind the
containsassertions, rather than finding a way to make them work with snapbox. Thankfully, snapbox is designed to let people build their own thing (see #14790). I considered reusing snapbox's[..]matches but the code here is pretty minimal, the logic is similar enough, and I don't have a great abstraction for snapbox for it. If there was more of a need, I'd make something work in snapbox. As such, thecontainsassertions are no longer deprecated.While doing this last pass through, I did some polish on the code as well.
How should we test and review this PR?
Additional information