fix(complete): Don't complete files for any value#14653
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Oct 8, 2024
Merged
fix(complete): Don't complete files for any value#14653bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
We now need to opt-in to path completions for values, which can be as simple as setting the value parser to be for `PathBuf`s. We'll now show a lot less irrelevant completions.
Collaborator
Contributor
|
Thanks! @bors r+ |
Contributor
Contributor
Contributor
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2024
Update cargo 8 commits in ad074abe3a18ce8444c06f962ceecfd056acfc73..15fbd2f607d4defc87053b8b76bf5038f2483cf4 2024-10-04 18:18:15 +0000 to 2024-10-08 21:08:11 +0000 - initial version of checksum based freshness (rust-lang/cargo#14137) - feat: Add custom completer for completing registry name (rust-lang/cargo#14656) - Document build-plan as being deprecated (rust-lang/cargo#14657) - fix(complete): Don't complete files for any value (rust-lang/cargo#14653) - Add more SAT resolver tests (rust-lang/cargo#14614) - fix: avoid inserting duplicate `dylib_path_envvar` when calling `cargo run` recursively (rust-lang/cargo#14464) - chore(deps): bump gix-path from 0.10.9 to 0.10.11 (rust-lang/cargo#14489) - improve error reporting when feature not found in `activated_features` (rust-lang/cargo#14647) --- This also adds three license exceptions to Cargo. * arrayref — BSD-2-Clause * blake3 — CC0-1.0 OR Apache-2.0 OR Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception * constant_time_eq — CC0-1.0 OR MIT-0 OR Apache-2.0 These exceptions were added to rustc in rust-lang#126930, so should be fine for Cargo as well.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR try to resolve?
We now need to opt-in to path completions for values, which can be as simple as setting the value parser to be for
PathBufs.We'll now show a lot less irrelevant completions.
How should we test and review this PR?
Additional information