Conversation
Split out the `write_err` and `InputString` from `internals` into their own crate. As a demo the crate is part of this repo still but it should be moved up to a standalone repo because it is not Bitcoin specific. Please note the authors list has Kix up front because he wrote all this code originally. He is not around right now to give his consent but I believe this is still the correct thing to do to give him credit for work done. Andrew is up next because he is BDFL round here. I'm last because I am just did the cut'n paste and raised the PR. Next step, if this gets concept ACK'd is to create a new repo.
|
weak concept ACK. Musing on whether we just want to bump our MSRV to 1.80 before we do 1.0. Probably not ... it'll be over a year before our rules would let us do that. Can you clarify why these things should have their own crate rather than |
|
Yes, described in #3708 |
|
Bump @apoelstra , needs:
|
|
Personally I'd rather we just encapsulate the offending |
|
Might be easier said that done. Its used by |
Yeah, this I can get behind. |
|
Playing with this led to #3817 |
|
This has no legs, we are going to try and encapsulate the |
Chasing concept ACK please @apoelstra. Also we need to bike shed the crate name and create the repo.
Split out the
write_errandInputStringfrominternalsinto their own crate currently calledno-std-error.As a demo the crate is part of this repo still but it should be moved up to a standalone repo because it is not Bitcoin specific.
Please note the authors list has Kix up front because he wrote all this code originally. He is not around right now to give his consent but I believe this is still the correct thing to do to give him credit for work done. Andrew is up next because he is BDFL round here. I'm last because I just did the cut'n paste and raised the PR.
Next step, if this gets concept ACK'd is to create a new repo.
Close: #3322