Provide base classes in rosidl_pycommon#887
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Michael Carlstrom <rmc@carlstrom.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Carlstrom <rmc@carlstrom.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Carlstrom <rmc@carlstrom.com>
|
Pulls: ros2/rosidl_python#230, #887 |
Signed-off-by: Michael Carlstrom <rmc@carlstrom.com>
|
Pulls: ros2/rosidl_python#230, #887 |
|
@christophebedard The CI looks promising. I think aarch CI crashed. |
|
I found the job that was automatically triggered after the failure. Looks good, merging! |
Description
See ros2/rosidl_python#230
The original issue ros2/rosidl_python#215 recommended placing the base classes in
rosidl_pycommonand that seemed reasonable to me.Is this user-facing behavior change?
Did you use Generative AI?
Additional Information