@eboasson Is there another valid branch or tag for cyclonedds 0.9.0?

@wep21 double checking that it all builds properly before making that branch. I expect there'll be a releases/0.9.x branch and a new tag later today.

Full CI of this PR + ros2/rmw_cyclonedds#379

• Linux
• Linux-aarch64
• Windows

CI for only cyclonedds to verify that the

projectroot.src.core.ddsc.tests.start_roudi
test failure in the full CI run above is now gone:

• Linux
• Linux-aarch64
• Windows

All the other failures appear to be unrelated to the proposed change.

cc @clalancette

And another one of just Cyclone DDS — hopefully this eliminates the CMake warning on Windows:

• Linux
• Linux-aarch64
• Windows

Copy-paste from ros2/rmw_cyclonedds#379 (comment) of a full CI run that should end up green because it has the shared memory & the Windows CMake issues sorted:

• Linux
• Linux-aarch64
• Windows

The one failure on Linux looks like is has been in the repeated jobs as well: https://ci.ros2.org/view/nightly/job/nightly_linux_repeated/2594/#showFailuresLink . So that is all looking good.

I'm going to go ahead and approve this one, but someone needs to finish the review of ros2/rmw_cyclonedds#379 and approve it.

With that done, is it enough to merge this one and ros2/rmw_cyclonedds#379 ? Is there anything else needed?

With that done, is it enough to merge this one and ros2/rmw_cyclonedds#379 ? Is there anything else needed?

@clalancette I think its enough to merge this one and ros2/rmw_cyclonedds#379, @eboasson @MatthiasKillat @dkroenke please correct me if there is anything else to be done here

@sumanth-nirmal @clalancette @eboasson No, these two PRs are required and sufficient to upgrade ROS 2 to use iceoryx 2.0 and cyclonedds 0.9.x. For me shared memory works with those changes and all other ROS rolling repos (within the stated QoS and type constraints).