Changes ros_timer_init for ros_timer_init2#999
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Voldivh <eloyabmfcv@gmail.com>
fujitatomoya
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This does not change user experience with autostart flag for rclpy, i would recommend that rclpy as the same option as a counterpart of ros2/rclcpp#2005
|
Pulls: ros2/rcl#1004, ros2/rclcpp#2005, ros2/system_tests#508, #999 |
|
CI is green, see ros2/rcl#1004 (comment) |
you are not gonna implement this at this time? maybe this would be follow-up task for |
Taking into account the chain of PR's given this one ros2/rcl#1004 . Would it be ok if we address this comment in a different PR? |
This PR is a follow up of rcl#1004 and should be merged after that PR is merged.
Signed-off-by: Voldivh eloyabmfcv@gmail.com