Compatiblity with 'Populate Transitions' ros2/rcl#1269#495
Conversation
|
@emersonknapp can you review this? |
emersonknapp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems good to me.
Note: not a candidate for backport.
|
Pulls: #495, ros2/rcl_interfaces#185 |
|
@sloretz, for some reason only RHEL cloned the correct |
|
@Mergifyio rebase |
❌ Pull request can't be updated with latest base branch changesDetailsThis pull request seems to come from a fork, and Mergify needs the author's permission to update its branch. |
Signed-off-by: SuperJappie08 <36795178+SuperJappie08@users.noreply.github.com>
d1dafc1 to
6cac397
Compare
|
Pulls: ros2/rcl_interfaces#185, ros2/rcl#1269, ros2/rclcpp#2967, ros2/rclpy#1528, #495 |
Description
Compatibility with ros2/rcl#1269 and ros2/rcl_interfaces#185
Updates the
StateTransitionevent to reflect the changes made in the message.Is this user-facing behavior change?
Yes, the
timestampfield of theStateTransitionevent has been replaced withstampof typebuiltin_interfaces.msg.Time(instead of int).Did you use Generative AI?
No
Additional Information
Requires ros2/rcl_interfaces#185