Conversation
2344a1a to
8341193
Compare
|
As a follow up of this PR the package |
|
rqt_bag depends on rqt_plot, so that may need to move as well. |
|
|
|
The dependency chain now is |
|
That is true. A circular dependency on the repository level is not fun and should be avoided. I might create a "relay" package then which just chooses the Qwt version. Then that package can be branches and |
|
I created a "dependency only" package called That way we can use Qwt 5 for Jade and older and Qwt 6.1 for Kinetic (once it becomes available as a system package or someone creates a custom package which we import into our apt repo). |
|
With |
|
I posted on the SIG and am looking forward for feedback on these changes: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ros-sig-rqt/1zcA4xlQ3E0 |
…ins#359 changes for rqt_image_view
With these patches the same code base can satisfy both of the following use cases (with only minimal
try / exceptlogic:The version dependency on
python_qt_bindingensures that the packages which useQtWidgetsare getting the changes from ros-visualization/python_qt_binding#31.This is required for a release into Kinetic.