Conversation
7ec24f2 to
8d72b25
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #125 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 45.85% 43.32% -2.53%
==========================================
Files 38 42 +4
Lines 1230 1424 +194
Branches 648 786 +138
==========================================
+ Hits 564 617 +53
- Misses 72 85 +13
- Partials 594 722 +128
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
90f5649 to
24f4809
Compare
|
this is a good transition PR for the Joint/Sensor components. I agree to go on with this. |
b3c05c0 to
f325134
Compare
…namicJointState message
f325134 to
34f8e64
Compare
| { | ||
| SetUpHandles(); | ||
| EXPECT_THAT(robot_.get_registered_joint_names(), ElementsAre(JOINT_NAME)); | ||
| // EXPECT_THAT(robot_.get_registered_joint_names(), ElementsAre(JOINT_NAME)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's the status of these tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
They only test the OperationModeHandle. The joint handles tests are now in test_joint_handle.cpp and test_register_joints.cpp.
|
With #121 being merged, is this going to be reworked to use the same |
The intention of this PR is to add a new type of joint handle and the interfaces to handle them. They are intended to replace
JointStateHandleandJointCommandHandleeventually. For the duration of this PR, however, they will coexist.See #124 for more information.