You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on May 31, 2025. It is now read-only.
Why are *eigenToTF-functions using Eigen::Affine to represent tf::Transformation instead of Eigen::Isometry? Isn't the latter one correct to describe translation+rotation in 3D? Eigen explicitly prohibits conversion from affine to isometry:
Why are *eigenToTF-functions using Eigen::Affine to represent tf::Transformation instead of Eigen::Isometry? Isn't the latter one correct to describe translation+rotation in 3D? Eigen explicitly prohibits conversion from affine to isometry:
So I ask myself if I can somehow still convert it, or if I also should use Affine to represent 3D-Transformations, which doesn't seem right to me.
Best regards,
Sebastian