docs: add autonomous PR monitoring prompt by rjmurillo-bot · Pull Request #299 · rjmurillo/ai-agents

rjmurillo-bot · 2025-12-23T18:19:26Z

Summary

Adds a prompt template for running autonomous PR monitoring sessions
Documents the pattern used in this session for proactive CI fix resolution
Captures key commands and techniques for automated PR maintenance

What This Enables

Users can start similar autonomous monitoring sessions using the documented prompt.

The prompt captures:

Monitoring cadence (120 seconds)
CI failure patterns and fixes (cross-platform paths, exit codes, missing labels)
Merge conflict resolution approach
ADR-014 enforcement
Fix PR creation for infrastructure issues

Test plan

Review prompt content for accuracy
Verify documented commands work as expected

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Captures the pattern for running an autonomous monitoring loop that: - Monitors PRs every 120 seconds - Fixes CI failures proactively - Resolves merge conflicts - Enforces ADR-014 (HANDOFF.md read-only) - Creates missing GitHub labels - Creates fix PRs for infrastructure issues 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

coderabbitai · 2025-12-23T18:19:31Z

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds documentation file defining an autonomous PR monitoring system that continuously checks open PRs every 120 seconds, determines needed actions, and applies fixes or creates review branches with specific criteria for blocked PRs and priority issues.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation `docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md`	New file specifying PR monitoring prompt with continuous loop logic (8-hour duration, 120-second checks), blocked PR detection, fixable issue categories (CI failures, missing labels, merge conflicts, ADR-014 violations), direct vs. improvement fix distinction, GitHub CLI commands, and sample execution output.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested reviewers

rjmurillo-bot

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	Title follows conventional commit format with 'docs:' prefix and clearly describes the new documentation file for autonomous PR monitoring.
Description check	✅ Passed	Description relates directly to the changeset, explaining what the prompt template does, what it enables, and includes a test plan.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment
Commit unit tests in branch docs/autonomous-monitoring-prompt

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51c9019 and edfa094.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (15)

**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/architecture/ADR-001-markdown-linting.md)

**/*.md: Add language identifiers to all fenced code blocks (MD040). Use appropriate language identifiers: csharp for C#, powershell for PowerShell, bash for shell, json for JSON, yaml for YAML, markdown for Markdown, text for plain text or generic/pseudo code
Wrap generic types in backticks to escape angle brackets (e.g., ArrayPool<T> instead of ArrayPool) to comply with MD033 inline HTML restrictions and ensure proper rendering
Add blank lines around code blocks to comply with MD031 markdown linting requirements
Add blank lines around lists to comply with MD032 markdown linting requirements
Add blank lines around headings to comply with MD022 markdown linting requirements
Use ATX-style headings (# Heading) consistently across all markdown documents (MD003)
Use fenced code block style (triple backticks) consistently, with backtick delimiters rather than tildes (MD046, MD048)
Allow only specific HTML elements in markdown: <br>, <kbd>, <sup>, <sub>. Escape or avoid other inline HTML elements to comply with MD033 restrictions

**/*.md: Always specify language identifiers on fenced code blocks for syntax highlighting in markdown documentation
Add blank lines before and after code blocks, lists, and headings in markdown documents
Detect and repair malformed code fence closings where closing fences have language identifiers (e.g., text) instead of plain closing fences ( )

**/*.md: Run markdownlint --fix before manual edits to auto-resolve spacing violations (MD031/MD032/MD022)
Use text for pseudo-code and tool invocations, and use specific language identifiers (json, csharp, bash, yaml, markdown) for actual code in MD040 code blocks
Wrap .NET generic types like ArrayPool<T>, Span<T>, Vector256 in backticks to prevent MD033 inline HTML violations in C# documentation

Fix malformed markdown code fence closings by ensuring closing fences never include language identifiers (use instead oflanguage)

Use HTML comment...

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

**/*.md: Writing Quality: - Grade 9 reading level - Active voice, direct address - Short sentences (under 15 words ideal) - No fluff, filler, or marketing language - Replace adjectives with data where possible - Every sentence must pass the "so what" test
Flag: - Passive voice - Vague language (nearly, some, almost, very) - Jargon without definitions - Broken links and outdated procedures - Inconsistency with code changes in same PR - Missing context for new features or APIs
Ignore (handled by .markdownlint-cli2.yaml): - Markdown formatting and style - Heading level choices - Link formatting variations - Minor punctuation preferences

Documentation Review Criteria ### P0 (Must Fix) - Absolute paths - Broken internal links ### P1 (Should Fix) - Missing heading hierarchy - Code blocks without language ### Skip - Markdown linting (markdownlint-cli2 handles) Prefix all comments with: [P0], [P1], or [P2]

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/docs/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/skills/documentation.md)

Structure requirements documents with Purpose, Configuration, Required Rules, Disabled Rules, Common Patterns, Troubleshooting, and References sections

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

docs/**/*.md

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (docs/markdown-linting.md)

docs/**/*.md: Every fenced code block must include a language identifier
Fenced code blocks must be surrounded by blank lines
Lists must be surrounded by blank lines
Headings must be surrounded by blank lines
Inline HTML is restricted; generic types must be wrapped in backticks to avoid being interpreted as HTML tags
Use appropriate language identifiers for code blocks: 'csharp' for C#, 'powershell' for PowerShell, 'bash' for Bash/Shell, 'json' for JSON, 'yaml' for YAML, 'markdown' for Markdown examples, 'text' for plain text/pseudo-code, 'sql' for SQL, 'xml' or 'html' for XML/HTML, 'javascript' for JavaScript, 'typescript' for TypeScript, 'python' for Python
Exclude node_modules/ and .agents/ directories from markdown linting

Create dedicated documentation pages for significant features, including installation guides with parameters and usage examples

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/*.{md,json,yml,yaml,ps1,sh,bash,toml,ini,cfg,config,txt}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/retrospective/phase1-remediation-pr43.md)

Use relative paths only in documentation and configuration files; avoid absolute paths (e.g., C:\ on Windows) to prevent environment contamination and maintain cross-platform portability

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/*.{md,markdown}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/retrospective/2025-12-17-session-failures.md)

Do not include auto-generated headers in generated files

Run markdown lint on session logs and documentation before committing

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/*.{ps1,yml,yaml,md}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/analysis/003-session-protocol-skill-gate.md)

Validate skill availability before implementing GitHub operations - Check if .claude/skills/github/ directory exists and contains the required capability; list available GitHub skill scripts; read the skill-usage-mandatory memory; document available skills in session log; use existing skills if they exist rather than writing inline code

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/*.{md,js,ts,tsx,jsx,json,yaml,yml,sh,ps1}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/retrospective/2025-12-18-serena-memory-reference-migration.md)

Search entire codebase for pattern before migration to identify all references

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/*.{md,js,ts,tsx,jsx}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/retrospective/2025-12-18-serena-memory-reference-migration.md)

Include fallback clause when migrating to tool calls for graceful degradation

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/*.{md,ts,tsx,js,jsx,py}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/retrospective/2025-12-18-session-17-retrospective.md)

For features, add new sections rather than refactoring existing logic

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/*.{js,ts,ps1,py,json,yaml,yml,md}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/retrospective/2025-12-19-skill-extraction-summary.md)

Use identical syntax for all instances when migrating patterns to maintain consistency

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/*.{md,txt}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/pr-batch-review-session-2025-12-20.md)

Use consistent MCP acronym terminology in documentation (Copilot review feedback)

Use artifact naming conventions: EPIC-NNN-kebab-case for epics, PRD-feature-name.md for product requirements, ADR-NNN-kebab-case-title.md for architectural decisions, TASK-EPIC-NNN-MM for tasks, NNN-feature-plan.md for plans

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

{**/*.md,.serena/**}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/qa/002-pr-201-skills-clarity-fixes.md)

Provide concrete examples when documenting MCP tool naming conventions - include breakdown of server name and tool-id components

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/{SESSION-PROTOCOL,*-PROTOCOL,*.md}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/archive/HANDOFF-2025-12-22.md)

Use RFC 2119 keywords (MUST, SHOULD, MAY) in protocol documentation and enforcement mechanisms

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/!(node_modules)/**/*.{md,yml,json}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/archive/HANDOFF-2025-12-22.md)

Use mcp__serena__read_memory tool calls instead of direct file path references in instructional documentation

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

**/*.{md,yml,yaml}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.agents/analysis/156-pr-review-analysis.md)

Fix GitHub Actions template syntax: Use ${{ }} instead of @{{ }} for template variables (e.g., ${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }})

Files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

🧠 Learnings (5)

📚 Learning: 2025-12-16T06:26:21.783Z

Learnt from: rjmurillo
Repo: rjmurillo/ai-agents PR: 43
File: templates/agents/qa.shared.md:1-311
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T06:26:21.783Z
Learning: In the rjmurillo/ai-agents repository, follow the project's Markdown lint rules defined in .markdownlint-cli2.yaml. Do not flag MD031/MD032 (blank lines around fences) or similar style issues in Markdown files if the repository's markdownlint configuration passes; rely on the config to determine formatting and style decisions.

Applied to files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

📚 Learning: 2025-12-16T06:26:44.230Z

Learnt from: rjmurillo
Repo: rjmurillo/ai-agents PR: 43
File: templates/agents/implementer.shared.md:33-40
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T06:26:44.230Z
Learning: In the rjmurillo/ai-agents repository, markdownlint issues should be governed by the repository's .markdownlint-cli2.yaml configuration. Do not flag or enforce markdown formatting/style violations that are not surfaced by the configured rules. Apply this rule to all Markdown files (e.g., templates/agents/implementer.shared.md and others) and only flag issues that the project's markdownlint config would detect.

Applied to files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

📚 Learning: 2025-12-16T06:26:44.208Z

Learnt from: rjmurillo
Repo: rjmurillo/ai-agents PR: 43
File: templates/agents/planner.shared.md:73-121
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T06:26:44.208Z
Learning: In this repository (rjmurillo/ai-agents), do not flag Markdown formatting or style issues (MD031, MD032, heading levels, link formatting, punctuation) for Markdown files. These are already ignored by the project’s .markdownlint-cli2.yaml; rely on that configuration and the repository's coding guidelines for Markdown handling.

Applied to files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

📚 Learning: 2025-12-16T06:27:04.317Z

Learnt from: rjmurillo
Repo: rjmurillo/ai-agents PR: 43
File: src/copilot-cli/analyst.agent.md:39-44
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T06:27:04.317Z
Learning: In the rjmurillo/ai-agents repository, do not flag MD031 (blank lines around fenced code blocks) or MD032 (blank lines around lists) violations in Markdown files. These formatting rules are configured in the project’s .markdownlint-cli2.yaml, and such style issues do not affect agent instruction functionality. Apply this pattern to all Markdown files (recursively) and focus review attention on issues that affect behavior, correctness, or other lint rules.

Applied to files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

📚 Learning: 2025-12-16T08:00:20.752Z

Learnt from: rjmurillo
Repo: rjmurillo/ai-agents PR: 43
File: templates/agents/roadmap.shared.md:124-174
Timestamp: 2025-12-16T08:00:20.752Z
Learning: Review Markdown files to ensure nested code fences follow the rule: the outer fence uses more backticks than the inner fence (e.g., an outer `````` with four backticks containing an inner ```mermaid``` fence). This follows CommonMark conventions; verify that nesting does not break rendering by using a greater number of backticks for the outer fence than the inner one.

Applied to files:

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

🪛 LanguageTool

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

[style] ~3-~3: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...ntinuously monitors PRs and proactively fixes issues. ## Prompt ```text You will be...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

[style] ~113-~113: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...s 2. Fix CI failures - Analyze and fix common issues: - PowerShell `$env:TE...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

🔍 Remote MCP

Additional Context from PR Changes

New Documentation File Added
The PR introduces docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md (167 additions, 0 deletions), a self-contained prompt template for running an autonomous PR monitoring loop. It covers:
- Monitoring loop parameters (up to 8 hours total, polling every 120 seconds)
- Detailed monitoring strategy (prioritize actionable PRs, notify when all PRs are blocked on human review)
- Definitions of “blocked on others” vs. actionable issues
- Problems to fix aggressively:
  1. CI failures (Pester tests, workflow YAML issues)
  2. Missing GitHub labels (creates labels via gh label create)
  3. Merge conflicts (merge main into feature branches)
  4. ADR-014 violations (revert unauthorized HANDOFF.md changes)
  5. Cross-platform compatibility issues (path separators, OS-specific commands)
  6. Unresolved review threads (mark resolved when addressed)
- Guidance on direct fixes vs. improvements (directly patch blocking issues; improvements on separate branches)
- Classification of CI checks into blocking (must pass to merge) vs. non-blocking (optional)
- Prescribed output format per cycle: <scratchpad>, <cycle_summary>, <actions_taken>
- Sample GitHub CLI commands (gh pr checks, gh merge, gh notify, etc.) (github.com)
Commit History Details
1. Initial commit: Adds the core autonomous monitoring loop prompt, outlining the 120 s cadence and list of direct fixes.
2. Follow-up commit: Expands the prompt with richer monitoring strategies, aggressive problem-solving guidelines, structured output sections, and concrete CLI examples. (github.com)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md (1)

1-165: Well-structured prompt documentation with clear operational guidance.

The prompt template effectively outlines the monitoring loop parameters, strategy, and actionable problems. Language identifiers are present and correct. The scratchpad/cycle_summary/actions_taken format provides a clear mental model for autonomous operation. Example commands and the ADR-014 enforcement guidance add practical value for implementation.

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

gemini-code-assist

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new documentation file, docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md, which provides a detailed prompt template for running autonomous PR monitoring sessions. The document is well-written, clearly outlining the agent's tasks, key commands, and prerequisites.

My review focused on adherence to the repository's style guide. I have one suggestion to improve the documentation's portability by replacing a hardcoded, machine-specific example path with a generic, relative one that is more consistent with conventions found elsewhere in the repository.

Overall, this is a valuable addition that effectively documents a useful process.

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR adds documentation for running autonomous PR monitoring sessions. The document captures the patterns and techniques developed during actual autonomous monitoring sessions, enabling users to replicate this workflow.

Key additions:

Template prompt for starting 8-hour autonomous monitoring loops with 120-second check intervals
Documentation of common CI failure patterns and automated fixes (cross-platform paths, exit codes, missing labels, ADR-014 violations)
Key GitHub CLI commands for PR status checking, log retrieval, and label management

Expanded the prompt to include detailed monitoring strategies, aggressive problem-solving guidelines, and structured output formats for managing PRs effectively. Signed-off-by: Richard Murillo <6811113+rjmurillo@users.noreply.github.com>

Updated 6 out of 16 PRs that were behind main: ✅ PR #313 (copilot/investigate-workflow-failure): 4 commits behind → up to date ✅ PR #310 (docs/adr-017): 5 commits behind → up to date ✅ PR #269 (copilot/add-pre-pr-validation-workflow): 17 commits behind → up to date ✅ PR #246 (docs/ai-misses): 10 commits behind → up to date ✅ PR #245 (refactor/issue-239-memory-decomposition-analysis): 22 commits behind → up to date ✅ PR #199 (feat/pr-comment-responder-memory-protocol): 10 commits behind → up to date 10 PRs require manual conflict resolution: ⚠️ PR #301, #300, #299, #285, #255, #247, #235, #202, #194, #143 Used gh pr update-branch to merge main into PR branches. Success rate: 37.5% (6/16 PRs updated without conflicts). Session log: .agents/sessions/2025-12-23-session-87-pr-branch-updates.md

Copilot

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

…effort (#322) * feat: add implementation plan for PR review merge state verification Session 85 lessons learned implementation plan: - Add PR merge state verification to pr-review command (Skill-PR-Review-006) - Create Test-PRMerged.ps1 script for GraphQL merge state checking - Document Thread Resolution Protocol (Skills PR-Review-004, -005) - Update Completion Criteria with merge verification Prevents wasted effort on already-merged PRs where gh pr view returns stale data. Related: Session 85, PR #315, PR #320 * feat: implement PR merge state verification (Issue #321) Implements Session 85 lessons learned to prevent wasted effort on merged PRs. Changes: - Create Test-PRMerged.ps1 script to check PR merge state via GraphQL * Exit code 0 = not merged (safe to proceed) * Exit code 1 = merged (skip review work) * GraphQL API is source of truth (gh pr view may return stale data) - Update pr-review command (.claude/commands/pr-review.md): * Add PR merge state verification to Step 1 * Add Thread Resolution Protocol section (Skills PR-Review-004, -005) * Update Completion Criteria with PR merge check - Thread Resolution Protocol documentation: * Single thread resolution (Skill-PR-Review-004) * Batch thread resolution using GraphQL mutation aliases (Skill-PR-Review-005) * Verification commands Testing: - ✅ Test-PRMerged.ps1 with merged PR #315 (exit code 1) - ✅ Test-PRMerged.ps1 with open PR #320 (exit code 0) Benefits: - Prevents wasted effort when gh pr view returns stale state - Reduces API calls via batch thread resolution (N calls → 1 call) - Documents 2-step process: reply + resolve thread Related: Session 85, PR #315, PR #320 Fixes #321 * docs: add Session 86 implementation log Comprehensive documentation of PR review improvements implementation. Deliverables: - Issue #321 created - Test-PRMerged.ps1 PowerShell script - pr-review.md updates (merge verification + thread resolution protocol) - Implementation plan document - PR #322 created Benefits: - Prevents wasted effort on merged PRs - Reduces API calls via batch thread resolution - Documents critical 2-step process (reply + resolve thread) Session metrics: - 45 minutes implementation time - 3 skills implemented (PR-Review-004, -005, -006) - 2 tests executed (merged PR #315, open PR #320) - 182 lines of code Related: Session 85, Issue #321, PR #322 * docs: Session 87 - Update out-of-date PR branches Updated 6 out of 16 PRs that were behind main: ✅ PR #313 (copilot/investigate-workflow-failure): 4 commits behind → up to date ✅ PR #310 (docs/adr-017): 5 commits behind → up to date ✅ PR #269 (copilot/add-pre-pr-validation-workflow): 17 commits behind → up to date ✅ PR #246 (docs/ai-misses): 10 commits behind → up to date ✅ PR #245 (refactor/issue-239-memory-decomposition-analysis): 22 commits behind → up to date ✅ PR #199 (feat/pr-comment-responder-memory-protocol): 10 commits behind → up to date 10 PRs require manual conflict resolution: ⚠️ PR #301, #300, #299, #285, #255, #247, #235, #202, #194, #143 Used gh pr update-branch to merge main into PR branches. Success rate: 37.5% (6/16 PRs updated without conflicts). Session log: .agents/sessions/2025-12-23-session-87-pr-branch-updates.md * fix: address PR #322 review comments Security fixes (gemini-code-assist[bot]): - Add $ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop' to Test-PRMerged.ps1 - Use parameterized GraphQL query to prevent injection vulnerability - Add try/catch for JSON parsing error handling Code quality fixes (Copilot): - Fix null reference on mergedBy (handle automated merges) - Fix string interpolation bug (use ${PullRequest} syntax) - Fix GraphQL mutation to use variables correctly Documentation fixes (Copilot): - Fix 'Skills' → 'Skill' capitalization consistency - Fix GraphQL variable inconsistency in mutation example - Add Owner/Repo fields to output object in planning doc - Fix 'gemini' → 'Gemini' capitalization - Clarify 182 lines = 96 (script) + 86 (docs) Addresses all review comments except #2644893439 (Pester tests). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: address PR #322 Copilot review comments - Update planning document to match secure implementation: - Use parameterized GraphQL queries instead of string interpolation - Remove duplicate Owner/Repo property definitions - Fix unreachable code and consistent null handling - Add proper try/catch error handling - Fix pr-review.md issues: - Replace `continue` with `return` (valid outside loop context) - Complete GraphQL mutation example with threadId parameter 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(naming): add numeric IDs to skill references per ADR-017 Update skill reference names to comply with ADR-017 format: - pr-review-merge-state-verification → pr-review-006-merge-state-verification - pr-review-thread-resolution-single → pr-review-004-thread-resolution-single - pr-review-thread-resolution-batch → pr-review-005-thread-resolution-batch 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(memory): extract session learnings to Serena memories Recursive learning extraction from session - 5 rounds total: - 6 new skills created - 3 existing skills updated - 6 rejected as duplicates New skills: - agent-workflow-post-implementation-critic-validation - orchestration-recursive-learning-extraction - pr-review-007-merge-state-verification - pr-review-008-session-state-continuity - pr-review-bot-mention-side-effects - validation-domain-index-format Updated skills: - graphql-pr-operations (thread resolution anti-pattern) - pattern-agent-generation-three-platforms (Claude variant maintenance) - pr-template-requirement (REST API remediation) - skill-index-selection-decision-tree (orphan prevention) All skills validated with atomicity >75% and indexed in domain files. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test: add Pester tests for Test-PRMerged.ps1 with 100% coverage (#383) * Initial plan * test: add comprehensive Pester tests for Test-PRMerged.ps1 with 100% coverage Co-authored-by: rjmurillo <6811113+rjmurillo@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: move Test-PRMerged.Tests.ps1 to correct location per governance standards Co-authored-by: rjmurillo <6811113+rjmurillo@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rjmurillo <6811113+rjmurillo@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: address PR review comments - skill ID consistency and documentation - Fix unclosed code block in pr-review.md (cursor[bot] critical bug) - Update all Skill-PR-Review-006 references to 007 for consistency - Correct evidence PR number from #345 to #315 - Update planning document status from [PLANNING] to [IMPLEMENTED] - Update implementation checklist to reflect completed tasks Addresses review comments from cursor[bot] and Copilot on PR #322 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: update test assertions to use Skill-PR-Review-007 Tests were checking for Skill-PR-Review-006 but script references 007. Addresses cursor[bot] comment on PR #322 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Richard Murillo <6811113+rjmurillo@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rjmurillo-bot <rjmurillo-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Richard Murillo <6811113+rjmurillo@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 23, 2025 18:19

github-actions Bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 23, 2025

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of rjmurillo-bot December 23, 2025 18:19 View session

gemini-code-assist Bot reviewed Dec 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

Copilot AI reviewed Dec 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

cursor Bot reviewed Dec 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread docs/autonomous-pr-monitor.md

This was referenced Dec 23, 2025

docs(retrospective): autonomous PR monitoring session analysis #300

Merged

docs: autonomous PR monitoring prompt and retrospective #301

Merged

coderabbitai Bot previously approved these changes Dec 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

rjmurillo mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2025

fix(ci): Required check 'Validate Memory Files' references non-existent workflow #341

Closed

4 tasks

Merge main to resolve conflicts

a04533d

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 24, 2025 09:56

rjmurillo-bot dismissed coderabbitai[bot]’s stale review via a04533d December 24, 2025 09:56

Copilot AI reviewed Dec 24, 2025

View reviewed changes

rjmurillo enabled auto-merge (squash) December 24, 2025 10:32

Merge branch 'main' into docs/autonomous-monitoring-prompt

25677b2

rjmurillo closed this Dec 24, 2025

auto-merge was automatically disabled December 24, 2025 10:32
Pull request was closed

rjmurillo reopened this Dec 24, 2025

rjmurillo enabled auto-merge (squash) December 24, 2025 10:33

coderabbitai Bot approved these changes Dec 24, 2025

View reviewed changes

rjmurillo merged commit 79e8953 into main Dec 24, 2025
42 checks passed

rjmurillo deleted the docs/autonomous-monitoring-prompt branch December 24, 2025 12:26

coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2025

feat(workflow): auto-flag PRs exceeding commit threshold #362

Closed

3 tasks

coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Dec 29, 2025

docs: missing protocol documentation for needs-split label #497

Closed

This was referenced Dec 29, 2025

docs: Improve autonomous-issue-development.md to match autonomous-pr-monitor.md style #506

Closed

docs(steering): populate agent-prompts.md with prompt engineering patterns #574

Closed

coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2026

Add golden principles with automated garbage collection #1300

Closed

coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request May 10, 2026

tech-debt: auto-update orchestrator prose to prevent stale module citations (DEF1) #1966

Closed

coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request May 22, 2026

docs(autonomous-pr-monitor): incomplete ready-to-merge definition allows false-positive completion #2048

Closed

coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request Jun 5, 2026

pr-autofix: re-triage live + detect superseded-by-main before acting per PR #2455

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

docs: add autonomous PR monitoring prompt#299

docs: add autonomous PR monitoring prompt#299
rjmurillo merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs/autonomous-monitoring-prompt

rjmurillo-bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 23, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

Walkthrough

Changes

Estimated code review effort

Suggested reviewers

Documentation Review Criteria ### P0 (Must Fix) - Absolute paths - Broken internal links ### P1 (Should Fix) - Missing heading hierarchy - Code blocks without language ### Skip - Markdown linting (markdownlint-cli2 handles) Prefix all comments with: [P0], [P1], or [P2]

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

rjmurillo-bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Summary

What This Enables

Test plan

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 23, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

Walkthrough

Changes

Estimated code review effort

Suggested reviewers

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

Documentation Review Criteria ### P0 (Must Fix) - Absolute paths - Broken internal links ### P1 (Should Fix) - Missing heading hierarchy - Code blocks without language ### Skip - Markdown linting (markdownlint-cli2 handles) Prefix all comments with: [P0], [P1], or [P2]

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Code Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 23, 2025 •

edited

Loading