Skip to content

archiver: use FS interface nearly everywhere and cleanup exports#5023

Merged
MichaelEischer merged 9 commits intorestic:masterfrom
MichaelEischer:cleanup-archiver
Aug 31, 2024
Merged

archiver: use FS interface nearly everywhere and cleanup exports#5023
MichaelEischer merged 9 commits intorestic:masterfrom
MichaelEischer:cleanup-archiver

Conversation

@MichaelEischer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What does this PR change? What problem does it solve?

The include/exclude filters have moved to the archiver and filter packages to simplify their reuse. The archiver and its filters nearly always use the FS interface with NodeFromFileInfo being the last exception. Cleaning that up depends on #5022 .

Was the change previously discussed in an issue or on the forum?

Part of #5021

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines.
  • I have enabled maintainer edits.
  • I have added tests for all code changes.
  • [ ] I have added documentation for relevant changes (in the manual).
  • [ ] There's a new file in changelog/unreleased/ that describes the changes for our users (see template).
  • I have run gofmt on the code in all commits.
  • All commit messages are formatted in the same style as the other commits in the repo.
  • I'm done! This pull request is ready for review.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@MichaelEischer MichaelEischer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Depending on parameters the paths in a snapshot do not directly
correspond to real paths on the filesystem. Therefore, reject funcs must
use the FS interface to work correctly.
With this change, NodeFromFileInfo is the last function that bypasses
the FS interface in the archiver.
@MichaelEischer MichaelEischer merged commit 3b438e5 into restic:master Aug 31, 2024
@MichaelEischer MichaelEischer deleted the cleanup-archiver branch August 31, 2024 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant