Fix wrong order of key/value in Lua map response #8266
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
@redis/core-team please approve a breaking change fix (details at the top), and mention if you think it should be backported to Redis 6.0. @nitaicaro @xhebox please have a look at the changes in the tests and tell me if i'm missing something. |
When a Lua script returns a map to redis (a feature which was added in redis 6 together with RESP3), it would have returned the value first and the key second. If the client was using RESP2, it was getting them out of order, and if the client was in RESP3, it was getting a map of value => key. This was happening regardless of the Lua script using redis.setresp(3) or not. This also affects a case where the script was returning a map which it got from from redis by doing something like: redis.setresp(3); return redis.call() This fix is a breaking change for redis 6.0 users who happened to rely on the wrong order (either ones that used redis.setresp(3), or ones that returned a map explicitly). This commit also includes other two changes in the tests: 1. The test suite now handles RESP3 maps as dicts rather than nested lists 2. Remove some redundant (duplicate) tests from tracking.tcl
Contributor
|
@oranagra I dont think there is anything missing. At least, I cant see any problem on code of this PR. And I did not find other test cases that needs to fix. |
itamarhaber
approved these changes
Jan 3, 2021
yossigo
approved these changes
Jan 3, 2021
Collaborator
|
@oranagra Given that it's SO broken and only available very briefly I think it will be OK to backport it to 6.0 with the proper disclaimers of course. |
madolson
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2021
Contributor
madolson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd also be okay with backporting it to 6. This just seems completely broken?
oranagra
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2021
When a Lua script returns a map to redis (a feature which was added in redis 6 together with RESP3), it would have returned the value first and the key second. If the client was using RESP2, it was getting them out of order, and if the client was in RESP3, it was getting a map of value => key. This was happening regardless of the Lua script using redis.setresp(3) or not. This also affects a case where the script was returning a map which it got from from redis by doing something like: redis.setresp(3); return redis.call() This fix is a breaking change for redis 6.0 users who happened to rely on the wrong order (either ones that used redis.setresp(3), or ones that returned a map explicitly). This commit also includes other two changes in the tests: 1. The test suite now handles RESP3 maps as dicts rather than nested lists 2. Remove some redundant (duplicate) tests from tracking.tcl (cherry picked from commit 2017407)
JackieXie168
pushed a commit
to JackieXie168/redis
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2021
When a Lua script returns a map to redis (a feature which was added in redis 6 together with RESP3), it would have returned the value first and the key second. If the client was using RESP2, it was getting them out of order, and if the client was in RESP3, it was getting a map of value => key. This was happening regardless of the Lua script using redis.setresp(3) or not. This also affects a case where the script was returning a map which it got from from redis by doing something like: redis.setresp(3); return redis.call() This fix is a breaking change for redis 6.0 users who happened to rely on the wrong order (either ones that used redis.setresp(3), or ones that returned a map explicitly). This commit also includes other two changes in the tests: 1. The test suite now handles RESP3 maps as dicts rather than nested lists 2. Remove some redundant (duplicate) tests from tracking.tcl
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When a Lua script returns a map to redis (a feature which was added in
redis 6 together with RESP3), it would have returned the value first and
the key second.
If the client was using RESP2, it was getting them out of order, and if
the client was in RESP3, it was getting a map of value => key.
This was happening regardless of the Lua script using redis.setresp(3)
or not.
This also affects a case where the script was returning a map which it got
from from redis by doing something like: redis.setresp(3); return redis.call()
This fix is a breaking change for redis 6.0 users who happened to rely
on the wrong order (either ones that used redis.setresp(3), or ones that
returned a map explicitly).
This commit also includes other two changes in the tests:
lists