perf: avoid unnecessary copy operation#3376
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ndyakov
reviewed
May 15, 2025
1ad81f8 to
8cd300f
Compare
ndyakov
approved these changes
May 19, 2025
ofekshenawa
pushed a commit
to ofekshenawa/go-redis
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2025
* optime: reduce unnecessary copy operations * add a comment * trigger CI without code changes, because the bug of docker * add comments
ofekshenawa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2025
* optime: reduce unnecessary copy operations * add a comment * trigger CI without code changes, because the bug of docker * add comments
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ring.goring.goIn struct
Ring, the size of shards can be up to 100 (#2190 (comment)), in this case, a copy operation is called for each heartbeat, and approximately 3.1 KB data are copied. This is a waste of CPU resources. So avoiding copy operations yields benefits.The pr #2931 reported a race here, but there actually isn't one. Because every time we get the slice
c.shards.list, we don't change slice itself, we only usec.shards.list[i].Clientwhich is concurrency-safe.