Skip to content

quick patch for PackPadded removal to propagate the correct size.#9593

Closed
anderspapitto wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
anderspapitto:pack-padded-fix
Closed

quick patch for PackPadded removal to propagate the correct size.#9593
anderspapitto wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
anderspapitto:pack-padded-fix

Conversation

@anderspapitto
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:

The underlying reason why this is even an issue is that the conversion
into and out of the 'fictional' onnx operators is done in an unhygenic
order. This doesn't address that, but it does fix the one observable
case where this produces an incorrect result, and unblocks some other
work being done.

Summary:

The underlying reason why this is even an issue is that the conversion
into and out of the 'fictional' onnx operators is done in an unhygenic
order. This doesn't address that, but it does fix the one observable
case where this produces an incorrect result, and unblocks some other
work being done.
Copy link
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@anderspapitto has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@anderspapitto anderspapitto deleted the pack-padded-fix branch July 19, 2018 21:40
anderspapitto added a commit to anderspapitto/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2018
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2018
#9613)

Summary:
…ize. (#9593)"

This reverts commit 85b2816.
Pull Request resolved: #9613

Reviewed By: bddppq

Differential Revision: D8929322

Pulled By: anderspapitto

fbshipit-source-id: 3ae4d320e5407acc1fb63a26b7d1f2ff4059eba9
jramseyer pushed a commit to jramseyer/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2018
…torch#9593)

Summary:
The underlying reason why this is even an issue is that the conversion
into and out of the 'fictional' onnx operators is done in an unhygenic
order. This doesn't address that, but it does fix the one observable
case where this produces an incorrect result, and unblocks some other
work being done.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#9593

Differential Revision: D8919125

Pulled By: anderspapitto

fbshipit-source-id: a88ca979c3b9d439863e223717d3697180c26121
jramseyer pushed a commit to jramseyer/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2018
pytorch#9613)

Summary:
…ize. (pytorch#9593)"

This reverts commit 85b2816.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#9613

Reviewed By: bddppq

Differential Revision: D8929322

Pulled By: anderspapitto

fbshipit-source-id: 3ae4d320e5407acc1fb63a26b7d1f2ff4059eba9
goodlux pushed a commit to goodlux/pytorch that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2018
…torch#9593)

Summary:
The underlying reason why this is even an issue is that the conversion
into and out of the 'fictional' onnx operators is done in an unhygenic
order. This doesn't address that, but it does fix the one observable
case where this produces an incorrect result, and unblocks some other
work being done.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#9593

Differential Revision: D8919125

Pulled By: anderspapitto

fbshipit-source-id: a88ca979c3b9d439863e223717d3697180c26121
goodlux pushed a commit to goodlux/pytorch that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2018
pytorch#9613)

Summary:
…ize. (pytorch#9593)"

This reverts commit 85b2816.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#9613

Reviewed By: bddppq

Differential Revision: D8929322

Pulled By: anderspapitto

fbshipit-source-id: 3ae4d320e5407acc1fb63a26b7d1f2ff4059eba9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants