Skip to content

[functorch] Move cond.py to _cond.py and expose cond() under functorch.experimental.control_flow.#89819

Closed
zhxchen17 wants to merge 1 commit intogh/zhxchen17/44/basefrom
gh/zhxchen17/44/head
Closed

[functorch] Move cond.py to _cond.py and expose cond() under functorch.experimental.control_flow.#89819
zhxchen17 wants to merge 1 commit intogh/zhxchen17/44/basefrom
gh/zhxchen17/44/head

Conversation

@zhxchen17
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@zhxchen17 zhxchen17 commented Nov 29, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary:
Similar to #88767 we want to reduce the chance that users
accidentally import private functions from functorch.experimental.cond as if they were public
interfaces. We also move cond() under control_flow.py to stay consistent with map() op.

Test Plan:
CI

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

cc @mlazos @soumith @voznesenskym @yanboliang @penguinwu @anijain2305 @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @chunyuan-w @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @Xia-Weiwen @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @desertfire

…nctorch.experimental.control_flow.

Summary:
Similar to #88767 we want to reduce the chance that users
accidentally import private functions from `functorch.experimental.cond` as if they were public
interfaces. We also move `cond()` under `control_flow.py` to stay consistent with `map()` op.

Test Plan:
CI

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 29, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/89819

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 3 Pending

As of commit 6aec97b:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

zhxchen17 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2022
…nctorch.experimental.control_flow.

Summary:
Similar to #88767 we want to reduce the chance that users
accidentally import private functions from `functorch.experimental.cond` as if they were public
interfaces. We also move `cond()` under `control_flow.py` to stay consistent with `map()` op.

Test Plan:
CI

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: bcce75d
Pull Request resolved: #89819
@zhxchen17 zhxchen17 requested a review from zou3519 November 29, 2022 03:36
@zhxchen17 zhxchen17 added the topic: not user facing topic category label Nov 29, 2022
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@zou3519 zou3519 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@zhxchen17
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Nov 29, 2022
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
…nctorch.experimental.control_flow. (pytorch#89819)

Summary:
Similar to pytorch#88767 we want to reduce the chance that users
accidentally import private functions from `functorch.experimental.cond` as if they were public
interfaces. We also move `cond()` under `control_flow.py` to stay consistent with `map()` op.

Test Plan:
CI

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#89819
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/zhxchen17/44/head branch June 8, 2023 19:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged module: dynamo topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants