Conversation
aten/src/ATen/native/Vision.cpp
Outdated
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
aten/src/ATen/native/Vision.cpp
Outdated
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
aten/src/ATen/native/Vision.cpp
Outdated
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
zou3519
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good! I left some questions. The one point of action would be to add a test for the (input.size(1) > 1024 and dim == 4) case
aten/src/ATen/nn_parse.py
Outdated
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sorry, something went wrong.
facebook-github-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@li-roy has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
|
@pytorchbot retest this please |
|
|
That is a very big number |
|
upon further testing, this just doesn't work on any cudnn version. it throws error on some and gives wrong output for others. |
facebook-github-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@li-roy has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
Summary: Partially addresses #8928. Maybe #7273? Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#8929 Reviewed By: ezyang Differential Revision: D8668919 Pulled By: li-roy fbshipit-source-id: 8ad07b224d2ab211c274c4c10f042501efaae32c
Summary: Partially addresses #8928. Maybe #7273? Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#8929 Reviewed By: ezyang Differential Revision: D8668919 Pulled By: li-roy fbshipit-source-id: 8ad07b224d2ab211c274c4c10f042501efaae32c
Summary: Partially addresses pytorch#8928. Maybe pytorch#7273? Pull Request resolved: pytorch#8929 Reviewed By: ezyang Differential Revision: D8668919 Pulled By: li-roy fbshipit-source-id: 8ad07b224d2ab211c274c4c10f042501efaae32c
Partially addresses #8928.
Maybe #7273?