[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI by davidberard98 · Pull Request #73322 · pytorch/pytorch

davidberard98 · 2022-02-23T22:40:16Z

Stack from ghstack:

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785.

This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing.

Differential Revision: D34436844

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. [ghstack-poisoned]

pytorch-bot · 2022-02-23T22:40:20Z

CI Flow Status

⚛️ CI Flow

Ruleset - Version: v1
Ruleset - File: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/8e62ca8d90b58f07ae31eccf9ab0ce7a90d02d6e/.github/generated-ciflow-ruleset.json
PR ciflow labels: ciflow/default
Add ciflow labels to this PR to trigger more builds:

Workflows	Labels (bold enabled)	Status
Triggered Workflows
linux-binary-conda	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_conda`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
linux-binary-libtorch-cxx11-abi	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_libtorch`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
linux-binary-libtorch-pre-cxx11	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_libtorch`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
linux-binary-manywheel	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_wheel`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
linux-bionic-py3.7-clang9	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/noarch`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-bionic-rocm4.5-py3.7	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/rocm`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-docs	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/docs`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-vulkan-bionic-py3.7-clang9	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`, `ciflow/vulkan`	✅ triggered
linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7-bazel-test	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/bazel`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3-clang5-mobile-build	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/mobile`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3-clang5-mobile-custom-build-static	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/mobile`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-clang7-asan	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/sanitizers`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-clang7-onnx	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/onnx`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc5.4	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc7	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc7-no-ops	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
macos-arm64-binary-conda	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_conda`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
macos-arm64-binary-wheel	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_wheel`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
macos-binary-conda	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_conda`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
macos-binary-libtorch-cxx11-abi	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_libtorch`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
macos-binary-libtorch-pre-cxx11	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_libtorch`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
macos-binary-wheel	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_wheel`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
pytorch-linux-xenial-py3-clang5-android-ndk-r19c-gradle-custom-build-single	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/android`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
pytorch-linux-xenial-py3-clang5-android-ndk-r19c-gradle-custom-build-single-full-jit	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/android`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	✅ triggered
win-vs2019-cpu-py3	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/trunk`, `ciflow/win`	✅ triggered
win-vs2019-cuda11.3-py3	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/default`, `ciflow/trunk`, `ciflow/win`	✅ triggered
windows-binary-libtorch-cxx11-abi	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_libtorch`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
windows-binary-libtorch-pre-cxx11	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_libtorch`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
windows-binary-wheel	`ciflow/binaries`, `ciflow/binaries_wheel`, `ciflow/default`	✅ triggered
Skipped Workflows
caffe2-linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc5.4	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
docker-builds	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/ios`, `ciflow/macos`, `ciflow/scheduled`	🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-coreml	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/ios`, `ciflow/macos`, `ciflow/scheduled`	🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-custom-ops	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/ios`, `ciflow/macos`, `ciflow/scheduled`	🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-metal	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/ios`, `ciflow/macos`, `ciflow/scheduled`	🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-x86-64	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/ios`, `ciflow/macos`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-x86-64-coreml	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/ios`, `ciflow/macos`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda10.2-py3.7-gcc7	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/libtorch`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/libtorch`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
linux-bionic-cuda10.2-py3.9-gcc7	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/slow`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
linux-docs-push	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/scheduled`	🚫 skipped
linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7-no-ops	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
macos-10-15-py3-arm64	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/macos`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
macos-10-15-py3-lite-interpreter-x86-64	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/macos`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
macos-11-py3-x86-64	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/macos`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
parallelnative-linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc5.4	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
periodic-libtorch-linux-bionic-cuda11.5-py3.7-gcc7	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/libtorch`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/scheduled`	🚫 skipped
periodic-libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda11.1-py3.7-gcc7	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/libtorch`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/scheduled`	🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-bionic-cuda11.5-py3.7-gcc7	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/scheduled`	🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-xenial-cuda10.2-py3-gcc7-slow-gradcheck	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/scheduled`, `ciflow/slow`, `ciflow/slow-gradcheck`	🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-xenial-cuda11.1-py3.7-gcc7-debug	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/scheduled`	🚫 skipped
periodic-win-vs2019-cuda11.1-py3	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/scheduled`, `ciflow/win`	🚫 skipped
periodic-win-vs2019-cuda11.5-py3	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cuda`, `ciflow/scheduled`, `ciflow/win`	🚫 skipped
pytorch-linux-xenial-py3-clang5-android-ndk-r19c-build	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/android`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`	🚫 skipped
pytorch-xla-linux-bionic-py3.7-clang8	`ciflow/all`, `ciflow/cpu`, `ciflow/linux`, `ciflow/trunk`, `ciflow/xla`	🚫 skipped

facebook-github-bot · 2022-02-23T22:40:21Z

🔗 Helpful links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/73322
📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR
📄 Preview C++ docs built from this PR
↩️ [fb-only] Re-run with SSH instructions
❓Need help or want to give feedback on the CI? Visit our office hours

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 54966e9 (more details on the Dr. CI page):

2/2 failures introduced in this PR

🕵️‍♀️ 2 failures not recognized by patterns:

The following CI failures may be due to changes from the PR

Job	Step	Action
^{pull / linux-bionic-rocm5.0-py3.7 / test (default, 2, 2, linux.rocm.gpu)}	^{Checkout PyTorch}	🔁 rerun
^{pull / linux-bionic-rocm5.0-py3.7 / test (default, 1, 2, linux.rocm.gpu)}	^{Checkout PyTorch}	🔁 rerun

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: 9d3b218 Pull Request resolved: #73322

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 · 2022-02-24T00:41:03Z

@davidberard98 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

1) remove test_jit_cuda_fuser from list of disabled tests 2) make the tests run on cpu (skip the tests instead of erroring) These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: 67e2653 Pull Request resolved: #73322

davidberard98 · 2022-02-24T00:46:51Z

@davidberard98 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

1) remove test_jit_cuda_fuser from list of disabled tests 2) make the tests run on cpu (skip the tests instead of erroring) These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: 2af9f7e Pull Request resolved: #73322

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

1) remove test_jit_cuda_fuser from list of disabled tests 2) make the tests run on cpu (skip the tests instead of erroring) These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: 95a0cfb Pull Request resolved: #73322

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

1) remove test_jit_cuda_fuser from list of disabled tests 2) make the tests run on cpu (skip the tests instead of erroring) These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: 380e98c Pull Request resolved: #73322

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

1) remove test_jit_cuda_fuser from list of disabled tests 2) make the tests run on cpu (skip the tests instead of erroring) These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: 0e54067 Pull Request resolved: #73322

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

1) remove test_jit_cuda_fuser from list of disabled tests 2) make the tests run on cpu (skip the tests instead of erroring) These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: 9b80ac8 Pull Request resolved: #73322

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

1) remove test_jit_cuda_fuser from list of disabled tests 2) make the tests run on cpu (skip the tests instead of erroring) These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: befd4c0 Pull Request resolved: #73322

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

1) remove test_jit_cuda_fuser from list of disabled tests 2) make the tests run on cpu (skip the tests instead of erroring) These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: d4d312c Pull Request resolved: #73322

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 · 2022-03-31T15:59:51Z

@davidberard98 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 · 2022-03-31T16:31:08Z

@davidberard98 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 · 2022-03-31T22:03:36Z

@davidberard98 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 · 2022-03-31T23:18:43Z

@davidberard98 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 · 2022-04-01T02:53:11Z

@davidberard98 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

eellison

Sweet! LGTM - @jjsjann123 may want to look over as well

jjsjann123 · 2022-04-01T17:34:52Z

            self._unary_test_helper(op, dtype, True)  # test random data

-    @unittest.skipIf(not RUN_CUDA, "requires CUDA")
+    @unittest.skipIf(True, "See issues 73395 and 75029")


hmmmm.. I don't remember seeing test failures in my last upstream push. let me take a look here.

jjsjann123

code change looks fine. Let's merge this one.
I can double check the failing tests afterwards.

Summary: Pull Request resolved: #73322 These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: eellison Differential Revision: D34436844 Pulled By: davidberard98 fbshipit-source-id: c5b14b33e7f369a6fa1e9cfbcb484a30dffc659e

fixes merge issue between #75016 and #73322 [ghstack-poisoned]

fixes merge issue between #75016 and #73322 ghstack-source-id: a79f74a Pull Request resolved: #75134

1) remove test_jit_cuda_fuser from list of disabled tests 2) make the tests run on cpu (skip the tests instead of erroring) These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: e64ec0b Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#73322

Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#73322 These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since pytorch#34785. Test Plan: Imported from OSS Reviewed By: eellison Differential Revision: D34436844 Pulled By: davidberard98 fbshipit-source-id: c5b14b33e7f369a6fa1e9cfbcb484a30dffc659e (cherry picked from commit b08f515)

[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in OSS CI

8e62ca8

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. [ghstack-poisoned]

pytorch-bot Bot added the ciflow/default label Feb 23, 2022

facebook-github-bot added the cla signed label Feb 23, 2022

davidberard98 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2022

[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in OSS CI

3a497fd

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. ghstack-source-id: 9d3b218 Pull Request resolved: #73322

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in OSS CI"

9bfa55c

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. [ghstack-poisoned]

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in OSS CI"

5e8294f

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 changed the title ~~[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in OSS CI~~ [JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI Feb 24, 2022

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

7610480

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 linked an issue Feb 24, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request

Add nvfuser tests to CI #72466

Closed

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

b9b020c

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

40b7f1e

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 added the with-ssh label Feb 25, 2022

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

bcb0965

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

51f0728

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

d3d04b5

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2022

Fix test_jit_cuda_fuser failure on non-CUDA nodes #73423

Closed

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

e8ddbda

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

suo removed the ciflow/default label Mar 22, 2022

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

73cb3e3

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2022

[JIT] Optionally validate nvfuser outputs after execution #74361

Closed

davidberard98 mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2022

[JIT] OpInfo tests for nvfuser #71299

Closed

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

92b645b

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

8e24d44

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

d2af824

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

Update on "[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI"

54966e9

These tests have been disabled in OSS CI since #34785. This disables the windows tests, which currently aren't passing. Differential Revision: [D34436844](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D34436844) [ghstack-poisoned]

eellison approved these changes Apr 1, 2022

View reviewed changes

jjsjann123 reviewed Apr 1, 2022

View reviewed changes

jjsjann123 approved these changes Apr 1, 2022

View reviewed changes

davidberard98 mentioned this pull request Apr 1, 2022

[JIT] nvfuser CI fixes #75116

Closed

davidberard98 mentioned this pull request Apr 1, 2022

[JIT] RUN_CUDA -> RUN_NVFUSER to fix nvfuser ci #75134

Closed

davidberard98 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2022

[JIT] RUN_CUDA -> RUN_NVFUSER to fix nvfuser ci

379aac2

fixes merge issue between #75016 and #73322 [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2022

Update on "[JIT] RUN_CUDA -> RUN_NVFUSER to fix nvfuser ci"

456aaa4

fixes merge issue between #75016 and #73322 [ghstack-poisoned]

davidberard98 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2022

[JIT] RUN_CUDA -> RUN_NVFUSER to fix nvfuser ci

857f21c

fixes merge issue between #75016 and #73322 ghstack-source-id: a79f74a Pull Request resolved: #75134

pytorchmergebot closed this in 27deefb Apr 1, 2022

facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/davidberard98/52/head branch April 5, 2022 14:17

WBobby mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2022

Add ROCm5.2.3/AMDGPU support for PyTorch WBobby/pytorch#2

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI#73322

[JIT] Enable NVFuser tests in CI#73322
davidberard98 wants to merge 22 commits intogh/davidberard98/52/basefrom
gh/davidberard98/52/head

davidberard98 commented Feb 23, 2022 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

pytorch-bot Bot commented Feb 23, 2022

⚛️ CI Flow

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Feb 23, 2022 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Feb 24, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Feb 24, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Mar 31, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Mar 31, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Mar 31, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Mar 31, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Apr 1, 2022

Uh oh!

eellison left a comment

Uh oh!

jjsjann123 Apr 1, 2022

Uh oh!

jjsjann123 left a comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

Conversation

davidberard98 commented Feb 23, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

pytorch-bot Bot commented Feb 23, 2022

⚛️ CI Flow

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Feb 23, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🔗 Helpful links

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

🕵️‍♀️ 2 failures not recognized by patterns:

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Feb 24, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Feb 24, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Mar 31, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Mar 31, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Mar 31, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Mar 31, 2022

Uh oh!

davidberard98 commented Apr 1, 2022

Uh oh!

eellison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jjsjann123 Apr 1, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jjsjann123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

davidberard98 commented Feb 23, 2022 •

edited

Loading

facebook-github-bot commented Feb 23, 2022 •

edited

Loading