Closed
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
This was referenced Mar 24, 2021
Closed
Contributor
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit ebd9f4e (more details on the Dr. CI page):
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
The `.is_view()` method actually only refers to backward mode views This is not a problem right now in master (and thus I didn't revert the other PR) because nothing creates forward AD views. [ghstack-poisoned]
albanD
added a commit
to albanD/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2021
ghstack-source-id: b26a8be Pull Request resolved: pytorch#54610
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
.is_view()method actually only refers to backward mode viewsThis is not a problem right now in master (and thus I didn't revert the other PR) because nothing creates forward AD views.
Stack from ghstack:
Differential Revision: D27396756