Closed
Conversation
Contributor
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit ad43740 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
🕵️ 1 new failure recognized by patternsThe following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages:
|
| Job | Step | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Run tests | 🔁 rerun | |
| Run tests | 🔁 rerun |
ci.pytorch.org: 1 failed
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).
Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.
Contributor
facebook-github-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mruberry has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
ngimel
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2021
Contributor
xsacha
pushed a commit
to xsacha/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2021
Summary: pytorch#51348 added CUDA support for orgqr but only a cuSOLVER path; the orgqr tests, however, were marked to run on builds with either MAGMA or cuSOLVER. This PR addresses the issue by creating a skipCUDAIfNoCusolver decator and applying to the orgqr tests. It triggers ci-all because our CI build with MAGMA but no cuSOLVER is CUDA 9.2, which does run in the typical PR CI. cc IvanYashchuk Pull Request resolved: pytorch#53975 Reviewed By: ngimel Differential Revision: D27036683 Pulled By: mruberry fbshipit-source-id: f6c0a3e526bde08c44b119ed2ae5d51fee27e283
laurentdupin
pushed a commit
to laurentdupin/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
Summary: pytorch#51348 added CUDA support for orgqr but only a cuSOLVER path; the orgqr tests, however, were marked to run on builds with either MAGMA or cuSOLVER. This PR addresses the issue by creating a skipCUDAIfNoCusolver decator and applying to the orgqr tests. It triggers ci-all because our CI build with MAGMA but no cuSOLVER is CUDA 9.2, which does run in the typical PR CI. cc IvanYashchuk Pull Request resolved: pytorch#53975 Reviewed By: ngimel Differential Revision: D27036683 Pulled By: mruberry fbshipit-source-id: f6c0a3e526bde08c44b119ed2ae5d51fee27e283
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#51348 added CUDA support for orgqr but only a cuSOLVER path; the orgqr tests, however, were marked to run on builds with either MAGMA or cuSOLVER.
This PR addresses the issue by creating a @skipCUDAIfNoCusolver decator and applying to the orgqr tests. It triggers ci-all because our CI build with MAGMA but no cuSOLVER is CUDA 9.2, which does run in the typical PR CI.
cc @IvanYashchuk