Skip to content

Use quiet_NaN() in calc_digamma, not NAN#50412

Closed
xuhdev wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
xuhdev:quite-nan
Closed

Use quiet_NaN() in calc_digamma, not NAN#50412
xuhdev wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
xuhdev:quite-nan

Conversation

@xuhdev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@xuhdev xuhdev commented Jan 12, 2021

This not only specifies the data types of these NaNs, but also indicate
that the function isn't signaling anything unusual.

This not only specifies the data types of these NaNs, but also indicate
that the function isn't signaling anything unusual.
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jan 12, 2021

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit ad60ff2 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@kshitij12345 kshitij12345 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Better to be explicit! Thanks for the catch!

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jan 12, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #50412 (ad60ff2) into master (5f8e1a1) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #50412   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.69%   80.70%           
=======================================
  Files        1905     1905           
  Lines      206789   206789           
=======================================
+ Hits       166872   166879    +7     
+ Misses      39917    39910    -7     

@xuhdev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

xuhdev commented Jan 12, 2021

@pytorchbot merge this please

@pytorchbot pytorchbot added the merge-this-please Was marked for merge with @pytorchbot merge this please label Jan 12, 2021
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ezyang has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ezyang merged this pull request in d33cc4c.

laurentdupin pushed a commit to laurentdupin/pytorch that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2026
Summary:
This not only specifies the data types of these NaNs, but also indicate
that the function isn't signaling anything unusual.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#50412

Reviewed By: mrshenli

Differential Revision: D25899828

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: a8ded10954ad08cba3098aa473c6b77f2e03dc93
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla signed merge-this-please Was marked for merge with @pytorchbot merge this please Merged open source

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants