[jit] better error message#43093
Closed
ppwwyyxx wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D23148516 |
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit fbaeb06 (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. This comment has been revised 7 times. |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#43093 without this it's hard to tell which module is going wrong Test Plan: ``` > TypeError: > 'numpy.int64' object in attribute 'Linear.in_features' is not a valid constant. > Valid constants are: > 1. a nn.ModuleList > 2. a value of type {bool, float, int, str, NoneType, torch.device, torch.layout, torch.dtype} > 3. a list or tuple of (2) ``` Differential Revision: D23148516 fbshipit-source-id: 5d85a15abc46485503c4e165b3bf93c5045eda0f
a25b1e9 to
fbaeb06
Compare
Contributor
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D23148516 |
eellison
approved these changes
Aug 17, 2020
Contributor
eellison
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks for doing this!
Contributor
|
This pull request has been merged in 825ec18. |
laurentdupin
pushed a commit
to laurentdupin/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#43093 without this it's hard to tell which module is going wrong Test Plan: ``` > TypeError: > 'numpy.int64' object in attribute 'Linear.in_features' is not a valid constant. > Valid constants are: > 1. a nn.ModuleList > 2. a value of type {bool, float, int, str, NoneType, torch.device, torch.layout, torch.dtype} > 3. a list or tuple of (2) ``` Reviewed By: eellison Differential Revision: D23148516 fbshipit-source-id: b86296cdeb7b47c9fd69b5cfa479914c58ef02e6
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary: without this it's hard to tell which module is going wrong
Test Plan:
Differential Revision: D23148516