Conversation
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit bdbe749 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
🕵️ 5 new failures recognized by patternsThe following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages:
|
|
I remember I saw this PR before, was that one reverted due to windows failure? |
yeah |
|
|
||
| template <> | ||
| void gemv<c10::complex<double>>(CUDABLAS_GEMV_ARGTYPES(c10::complex<double>)) { | ||
| cublasHandle_t handle = at::cuda::getCurrentCUDABlasHandle(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I believe you need to ifdef the function body for ROCm as well?
zasdfgbnm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, given that ROCm CI is not failing
facebook-github-bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@anjali411 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.
|
@anjali411 merged this pull request in c72ab19. |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#40238 Differential Revision: D22160528 Pulled By: anjali411 fbshipit-source-id: 04093e5929318a7acc9c9b502c76d0a8bf15d5e1
No description provided.