Skip to content

Improve testing of logical_not.#38505

Closed
gchanan wants to merge 1 commit intogh/gchanan/280/basefrom
gh/gchanan/280/head
Closed

Improve testing of logical_not.#38505
gchanan wants to merge 1 commit intogh/gchanan/280/basefrom
gh/gchanan/280/head

Conversation

@gchanan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gchanan gchanan commented May 14, 2020

Stack from ghstack:

This takes the testing of #38275, but doesn't include the kernel changes which are still being worked out.

Differential Revision: D21580574

This takes the testing of #38275, but doesn't include the kernel changes which are still being worked out.

[ghstack-poisoned]
gchanan added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2020
This takes the testing of #38275, but doesn't include the kernel changes which are still being worked out.

ghstack-source-id: 1c852db
Pull Request resolved: #38505
@gchanan gchanan requested a review from mruberry May 14, 2020 20:17
@vadimkantorov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

NumPy seems now to be in requirements. So I wonder if skipIfNumPyNotFound kind of skips are still meaningful

@dr-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

dr-ci Bot commented May 14, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit cfd76be (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 1/1 failures possibly* introduced in this PR
    • 1/1 non-CircleCI failure(s)

ci.pytorch.org: 1 failed


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 1 time.

@gchanan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

gchanan commented May 15, 2020

that's a good question, I don't really know. @mruberry do you know?

@mruberry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

that's a good question, I don't really know. @mruberry do you know?

It looks like we will be OK taking a NumPy dependency in the tests, but let's leave the skips for now.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mruberry mruberry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A million times better! Also a good candidate for torch.testing.fixture when that's in.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gchanan merged this pull request in 70ef9f5.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/gchanan/280/head branch May 19, 2020 14:16
laurentdupin pushed a commit to laurentdupin/pytorch that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2026
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#38505

This takes the testing of pytorch#38275, but doesn't include the kernel changes which are still being worked out.

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: mruberry

Differential Revision: D21580574

Pulled By: gchanan

fbshipit-source-id: f12317259cb7373989f6c9ad345b19aaac524851
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants