Skip to content

DOC: Correct upsample doc to match interpolation#38455

Closed
bharatr21 wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
bharatr21:upsample
Closed

DOC: Correct upsample doc to match interpolation#38455
bharatr21 wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:masterfrom
bharatr21:upsample

Conversation

@bharatr21
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix #38334 and correct the docs of torch.nn.functional.upsample

@bharatr21 bharatr21 requested a review from apaszke as a code owner May 14, 2020 02:39
@bharatr21
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Tagging @driazati for review

@dr-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

dr-ci Bot commented May 14, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit fcb0c52 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 1/1 failures possibly* introduced in this PR
    • 1/1 non-CircleCI failure(s)

ci.pytorch.org: 1 failed


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker.

See how this bot performed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@driazati driazati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@driazati is landing this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@driazati merged this pull request in 8752d6a.

laurentdupin pushed a commit to laurentdupin/pytorch that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2026
Summary:
Fix pytorch#38334 and correct the docs of `torch.nn.functional.upsample`
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#38455

Differential Revision: D21583515

Pulled By: driazati

fbshipit-source-id: 6ac5a79ba489bdcdd3fab34e4eddb4864e20a29e
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

nn.functional.upsample scale_factor parameter description makes no sense

5 participants