[jit] Include call stack in OSError message#34669
Closed
Conversation
eellison
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2020
Contributor
eellison
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, nice change. One question about defaulting of error_msg
Contributor
laurentdupin
pushed a commit
to laurentdupin/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
Summary: Previously there was no indication of why you would get an `OSError` for something (such as the generated methods of a `dataclass`). ](https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/diff/20426570/) Pull Request resolved: pytorch#34669 Pulled By: driazati Differential Revision: D20426570 fbshipit-source-id: 45d63631984fa26a87c03de5523fb10d8abbc6db
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously there was no indication of why you would get an
OSErrorfor something (such as the generated methods of adataclass).Differential Revision: D20426570