Skip to content

[BugFix] fix conditions to apply tma#174480

Closed
BoyuanFeng wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:mainfrom
BoyuanFeng:export-D92533457
Closed

[BugFix] fix conditions to apply tma#174480
BoyuanFeng wants to merge 1 commit intopytorch:mainfrom
BoyuanFeng:export-D92533457

Conversation

@BoyuanFeng
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@BoyuanFeng BoyuanFeng commented Feb 6, 2026

Summary: This diff fixes a wrong condition introduced in D92015529 for applying TMA. This should fix S618103.

Test Plan: Test in mast job.

Differential Revision: D92533457

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @kadeng @muchulee8 @amjames @chauhang @aakhundov @coconutruben @jataylo @jianyizh

Summary: This diff fixes a wrong condition introduced in D92015529 for applying TMA. This should fix S618103.

Test Plan: Test in mast job.

Differential Revision: D92533457
@pytorch-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pytorch-bot Bot commented Feb 6, 2026

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/174480

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit c263f8a with merge base bedb3e9 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pytorch-bot Bot commented Feb 6, 2026

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@meta-codesync
Copy link
Copy Markdown

meta-codesync Bot commented Feb 6, 2026

@BoyuanFeng has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating Diff in D92533457.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot Bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Feb 6, 2026
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

radeksm pushed a commit to radeksm/pytorch that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2026
Summary: This diff fixes a wrong condition introduced in D92015529 for applying TMA. This should fix S618103.

Test Plan: Test in mast job.

Differential Revision: D92533457

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#174480
Approved by: https://github.com/Microve
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants