Skip to content

Revert #154859#168297

Closed
ngimel wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
ngimel/storage_id
Closed

Revert #154859#168297
ngimel wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
ngimel/storage_id

Conversation

@ngimel
Copy link
Collaborator

@ngimel ngimel commented Nov 20, 2025

We suspect it's causing intermittent segfaults

@ngimel ngimel requested a review from sraikund16 as a code owner November 20, 2025 19:42
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR label Nov 20, 2025
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 20, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/168297

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit d51fc02 with merge base ba68238 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@ngimel ngimel added the topic: not user facing topic category label Nov 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@malfet malfet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM, but it was landed waaay back

@malfet
Copy link
Contributor

malfet commented Nov 21, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Nov 21, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@yangw-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot revert -m "this seems breaks the trunk ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2." -c nosignal

@yangw-dev
Copy link
Contributor

i revert this since the trunk breaks from this pr, let's see if this works, if not, please remerge this

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ngimel your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
This reverts commit 6707dc8.

Reverted #168297 on behalf of https://github.com/yangw-dev due to this seems breaks the trunk ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2. ([comment](#168297 (comment)))
@ngimel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ngimel commented Nov 21, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -f

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 21, 2025

❌ 🤖 pytorchbot command failed:

@pytorchbot merge: error: argument -f/--force: expected one argument

usage: @pytorchbot merge [-f MESSAGE | -i] [-ic] [-r [{viable/strict,main}]]

Try @pytorchbot --help for more info.

@ngimel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ngimel commented Nov 21, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -f "erroneous revert"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

JacobSzwejbka pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
We suspect it's causing intermittent segfaults

Pull Request resolved: #168297
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
JacobSzwejbka pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
This reverts commit 6707dc8.

Reverted #168297 on behalf of https://github.com/yangw-dev due to this seems breaks the trunk ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2. ([comment](#168297 (comment)))
JacobSzwejbka pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
We suspect it's causing intermittent segfaults

Pull Request resolved: #168297
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the ngimel/storage_id branch December 22, 2025 02:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged Reverted topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants