Skip to content

[MPS] Error out when BatchNorm is called for Complex#166215

Closed
malfet wants to merge 9 commits intogh/malfet/572/basefrom
gh/malfet/572/head
Closed

[MPS] Error out when BatchNorm is called for Complex#166215
malfet wants to merge 9 commits intogh/malfet/572/basefrom
gh/malfet/572/head

Conversation

@malfet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@malfet malfet commented Oct 25, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Or BatchNorm or LayerNorm for Long types

Discovered while trying to enable test_ops.py for MPS

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pytorch-bot Bot commented Oct 25, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/166215

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure, 19 Pending

As of commit 3dfb374 with merge base 7692fa0 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot Bot added ciflow/mps Run MPS tests (subset of trunk) release notes: mps Release notes category labels Oct 25, 2025
malfet added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2025
Or Long types

Discovered while trying to enable `test_ops.py` for MPS

ghstack-source-id: 6f287da
Pull Request resolved: #166215
@malfet malfet requested review from Skylion007 and dcci October 25, 2025 01:48
@malfet malfet added the topic: bug fixes topic category label Oct 25, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
malfet and others added 4 commits October 26, 2025 18:46
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
@malfet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

malfet commented Oct 31, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -f "Lint + MPS are green"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@atalman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

atalman commented Nov 3, 2025

@pytorchbot revert -c nosignal -m "sorry need to revert #166687"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@malfet your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
@pytorchmergebot pytorchmergebot added Reverted ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR labels Nov 3, 2025
[ghstack-poisoned]
malfet added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
Or Long types

Discovered while trying to enable `test_ops.py` for MPS

ghstack-source-id: 4789eb9
Pull Request resolved: #166215
@malfet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

malfet commented Nov 3, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -f "This should just work"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

etaf pushed a commit to etaf/pytorch-inductor-xpu that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Or BatchNorm or LayerNorm for Long types

Discovered while trying to enable `test_ops.py` for MPS
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#166215
Approved by: https://github.com/dcci, https://github.com/kulinseth, https://github.com/Skylion007
ghstack dependencies: pytorch#166214, pytorch#166687
pytorch-bot Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
pytorch-bot Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
Or BatchNorm or LayerNorm for Long types

Discovered while trying to enable `test_ops.py` for MPS
Pull Request resolved: #166215
Approved by: https://github.com/dcci, https://github.com/kulinseth, https://github.com/Skylion007
ghstack dependencies: #166214
Khanaksahu pushed a commit to Khanaksahu/pytorch that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
Or Long types

Discovered while trying to enable `test_ops.py` for MPS

ghstack-source-id: d16fc08
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#166215
@github-actions github-actions Bot deleted the gh/malfet/572/head branch December 4, 2025 02:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR ciflow/mps Run MPS tests (subset of trunk) Merged release notes: mps Release notes category Reverted topic: bug fixes topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants