[dynamo] Replace tx.inline_user_function_return with call_function#166007
[dynamo] Replace tx.inline_user_function_return with call_function#166007anijain2305 wants to merge 2 commits intogh/anijain2305/922/basefrom
Conversation
tx.inline_user_function_return only works for UserDefinedFunction, but as we use more VariableTracker build, we should use call_function. [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/166007
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 19 New FailuresAs of commit 5f81117 with merge base 8daef35 ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This PR needs a
|
…function" tx.inline_user_function_return only works for UserDefinedFunction, but as we use more VariableTracker build, we should use call_function. cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames Lucaskabela [ghstack-poisoned]
|
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
tx.inline_user_function_return only works for UserDefinedFunction, but
as we use more VariableTracker build, we should use call_function.
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @kadeng @chauhang @amjames @Lucaskabela @jataylo @chenyang78