Skip to content

[dynamo] Replace tx.inline_user_function_return with call_function#166007

Closed
anijain2305 wants to merge 2 commits intogh/anijain2305/922/basefrom
gh/anijain2305/922/head
Closed

[dynamo] Replace tx.inline_user_function_return with call_function#166007
anijain2305 wants to merge 2 commits intogh/anijain2305/922/basefrom
gh/anijain2305/922/head

Conversation

@anijain2305
Copy link
Contributor

@anijain2305 anijain2305 commented Oct 21, 2025

tx.inline_user_function_return only works for UserDefinedFunction, but
as we use more VariableTracker build, we should use call_function.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 21, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/166007

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 19 New Failures

As of commit 5f81117 with merge base 8daef35 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

anijain2305 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
tx.inline_user_function_return only works for UserDefinedFunction, but
as we use more VariableTracker build, we should use call_function.

ghstack-source-id: 07cd687
Pull Request resolved: #166007
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

…function"

tx.inline_user_function_return only works for UserDefinedFunction, but
as we use more VariableTracker build, we should use call_function.

cc voznesenskym penguinwu EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx chenyang78 kadeng chauhang amjames Lucaskabela

[ghstack-poisoned]
anijain2305 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
tx.inline_user_function_return only works for UserDefinedFunction, but
as we use more VariableTracker build, we should use call_function.

ghstack-source-id: 80ac247
Pull Request resolved: #166007
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as Stale.
Feel free to remove the Stale label if you feel this was a mistake.
If you are unable to remove the Stale label please contact a maintainer in order to do so.
If you want the bot to never mark this PR stale again, add the no-stale label.
Stale pull requests will automatically be closed after 30 days of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Dec 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jan 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/anijain2305/922/head branch February 19, 2026 02:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant