Skip to content

remove unnecessary registration#164481

Closed
eellison wants to merge 2 commits intogh/eellison/835/basefrom
gh/eellison/835/head
Closed

remove unnecessary registration#164481
eellison wants to merge 2 commits intogh/eellison/835/basefrom
gh/eellison/835/head

Conversation

@eellison
Copy link
Contributor

@eellison eellison commented Oct 2, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

scaled_mm already had needs_exact_strides in its op registration. also added a test showing these strides are being respected.

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @amjames @chauhang @aakhundov @coconutruben

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 2, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/164481

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 72fde2f with merge base d4e4f70 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

eellison added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 4f60c39
Pull Request resolved: #164481
[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link
Contributor

@drisspg drisspg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@eellison eellison added the topic: not user facing topic category label Oct 2, 2025
@eellison
Copy link
Contributor Author

eellison commented Oct 2, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 2, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR (#164481) was merged in 4691fe6 but it is still open, likely due to a Github bug, so mergebot is closing it manually. If you think this is a mistake, please feel free to reopen and contact Dev Infra.

pull bot pushed a commit to ais-developer/pytorch that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
scaled_mm already had `needs_exact_strides` in its op registration. also added a test showing these strides are being respected.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#164481
Approved by: https://github.com/drisspg, https://github.com/mlazos
jeffdaily added a commit to ROCm/pytorch that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
PR pytorch#164481 added unit test test_scaled_mm_preserves_strides in test/inductor/test_fp8.py.
It was missing the adjustment for ROCm's F8 types on MI300.
@amdfaa amdfaa mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2025
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
PR #164481 added unit test test_scaled_mm_preserves_strides in test/inductor/test_fp8.py. It was missing the adjustment for ROCm's F8 types on MI300.

Pull Request resolved: #164578
Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily

Co-authored-by: Jeff Daily <jeff.daily@amd.com>
@yangw-dev
Copy link
Contributor

it seems a rocm test start to fail after this pr

see:
https://hud.pytorch.org/pytorch/pytorch/commit/4691fe60700ac51a878775fd23a8f7c4548c6757#51853528524-box

2025-10-03T03:26:21.3422505Z FAILED [0.5430s] inductor/test_fp8.py::TestFP8Lowering::test_scaled_mm_preserves_strides - RuntimeError: CUDA error: HIPBLAS_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED when calling HIPBLAS_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED

seems related, about to revert this pr

@yangw-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot revert -c nosignal -m "failed test in trunk https://hud.pytorch.org/pytorch/pytorch/commit/4691fe60700ac51a878775fd23a8f7c4548c6757#51853528524-box"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Reverting PR 164481 failed

Reason: Command git -C /home/runner/work/pytorch/pytorch revert --no-edit 4691fe60700ac51a878775fd23a8f7c4548c6757 returned non-zero exit code 1

Auto-merging test/inductor/test_fp8.py
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/inductor/test_fp8.py
error: could not revert 4691fe60700... remove unnecessary registration (#164481)
hint: After resolving the conflicts, mark them with
hint: "git add/rm <pathspec>", then run
hint: "git revert --continue".
hint: You can instead skip this commit with "git revert --skip".
hint: To abort and get back to the state before "git revert",
hint: run "git revert --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false"
Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Chao1Han pushed a commit to Chao1Han/pytorch that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
scaled_mm already had `needs_exact_strides` in its op registration. also added a test showing these strides are being respected.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#164481
Approved by: https://github.com/drisspg, https://github.com/mlazos
Chao1Han pushed a commit to Chao1Han/pytorch that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
PR pytorch#164481 added unit test test_scaled_mm_preserves_strides in test/inductor/test_fp8.py. It was missing the adjustment for ROCm's F8 types on MI300.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#164578
Approved by: https://github.com/jeffdaily

Co-authored-by: Jeff Daily <jeff.daily@amd.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/eellison/835/head branch November 3, 2025 02:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants